Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 
Salem, OR 97301-2540 
(503)373-0050 
Fax (503) 378-5518 
www.lcd.state.or.us 
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor 
NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 
April 22, 2008 
TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan 
or Land Use Regulation Amendments 
FROM. Mara Ulloa, Plan Amendment Program Specialist 
SUBJECT: City of Beaverton Plan Amendment 
DLCD File Number 004-08 
The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of 
adoption. Copies of the adopted plan amendment are available for review at DLCD offices in Salem, 
the applicable field office, and at the local government office. 
Appeal Procedures* 
DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT OR DEADLINE TO APPEAL: May 7, 2008 
This amendment was not submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption. Pursuant to OAR 660-
18-060, the Director or any person is eligible to appeal this action to LUBA under ORS 197.830 to 
197.845. 
If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. 
If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of 
the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received 
written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be 
served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). 
Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. 
NOTE: THE APPEAL DEADLINE IS BASED UPON THE DATE THE DECISION 
WAS MAILED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. A DECISION MAY HAVE 
BEEN MAILED TO YOU ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN IT WAS MAILED 
TO DLCD. AS A RESULT YOUR APPEAL DEADLINE MAY BE EARLIER 
THAN THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE. 
Cc: Gloria Gardiner, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist 
Meg Fernekees, DLCD Regional Representative 
Jeff Salvon, City of Beaverton 
<paa> 
2 DLCD 
Notice of Adoption 
THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD 
WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION 
PER ORS 197 610, OAR CHAPTER 660 - DIVISION 18 
CD In person [^electronic \1\ mailed 
DEPfUF 
APR 16 2008 
LAND CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
For DLCD Use Only 
Jurisdiction: City of Beaverton 
0001 
Local file number: CPA2008-0001/ZMA2008-
Date of Adoption: 4/15/2008 Date Mailed: 4/17/2008 
Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? NoDate: 
• Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment K l Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
• Land Use Regulation Amendment IXI Zoning Map Amendment 
• New Land Use Regulation • Other: 
Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached" 
Non-discretionary annexation related comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning map amendment for a 
single property identified on the Washington County Tax Assessors Map as 1S114AB03700. The adopteted 
designaitons were perscribed by the Beaverton - Washington County Urban Planning Area Agreement and as 
such required no discretion in the adoption process. 
Does the Adoption differ from proposal? Please select one 
No 
Plan Map Changed from: Washington Co. OC 
Zone Map Changed from: Washington Co. OC 
Location: 9217 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy 
Specify Density: Previous: N/A - Commercial 
Applicable statewide planning goals: 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
to: City of Beaverton Corridor 
to: City of Beaverton OC 
Acres Involved: 0.16 
New: N/A - Commercial 
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D O 
Was an Exception Adopted? • YES ^ NO 
Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment. 
45-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? • Yes X No 
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? • Yes No 
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? • Yes • No 
DLCD file No. 004-08 (NOA) 
Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: 
Washington County, Clean Water Services, West Slope Water District 
Local Contact: Jeff Salvon 
Address. PO Box 4755 
City: Beaverton Zip: 97076-4755 
Phone: (503) 526-3725 Extension: 
Fax Number: 503-526-3720 
E-mail Address: jsalvon@ci.beaverton.or.us 
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision 
per ORS 197.610. OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18. 
1 Send this Form and TWO Complete Copies (documents and maps) of the Adopted Amendment to: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
2. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also submit 
an electronic copy, by either email or FTP You may connect to this address to FTP proposals and 
adoptions' webserver.lcd.state.or.us. To obtain our Username and password for FTP, call Mara Ulloa at 
503-373-0050 extension 238, or by emailing mara.ulloa@state.or.us, 
3 Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days 
following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 
4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings 
and supplementary information. 
5 The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working 
days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, 
the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 
6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who 
participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 
7. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please 
print on 8-1/2x11 green paper only. You may also call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax 
your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to mara.ulloa@state.or.us - ATTENTION 
PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. 
http://www.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/forms.shtml Updated November 27. 2006 
ORDINANCE NO. 4475 
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ANNEXING ONE PARCEL 
LOCATED AT 9217 SW BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY 
TO THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND ADDING THE PROPERTY 
TO THE DENNEY WHITFORD/RALEIGH WEST 
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE: EXPEDITED 
ANNEXATION 2008-0002 
WHEREAS, ORS 222.125 grants the City authority to initiate an expedited annexation 
process with the consent of all land owners and at least 50 percent of the 
electors of the territory to be annexed; and 
WHEREAS, No electors currently occupy the subject parcel and the owner of the property 
has signed and submitted a petition to annex the property into the City; and 
WHEREAS, The property is in Beaverton's Assumed Urban Services Area, and Policy 5.3.1.d 
of the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan states: "The City shall seek to 
eventually incorporate its entire Urban Services Area."; and 
WHEREAS, The property is in area "A" as set forth in the "Beaverton-Washington County 
Intergovernmental Agreement Interim Urban Service Plan" and, as prescribed by 
the agreement, the Washington County Board of Commissioners has agreed not 
to oppose annexations in area "A"; and 
WHEREAS, Council Resolution No. 3785 sets forth annexation policies for the City, and this 
action implements those policies; now, therefore, 
THE CITY OF BEAVERTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 
Section 1. The property shown on Exhibit A, and more particularly described in Exhibit B, is 
hereby annexed to the City of Beaverton, effective May 21, 2008. 
Section 2. Pursuant to Beaverton Code Section 9.06.035A, this property shall be added to 
the Denney Whitford / Raleigh West Neighborhood Association Committee 
Boundary. 
Section 3. The Council hereby withdraws the property annexed by this Ordinance from the 
Washington County's Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and Washington 
County's Urban Road Maintenance District. 
Section 4. The Council accepts the findings in the staff report attached hereto as Exhibit C 
as adequate demonstration of compliance with all applicable approval criteria. 
Section 5. The City Recorder shall place a certified copy of this Ordinance in the City's 
permanent records, and the Community Development Department shall forward 
a certified copy of this Ordinance to Metro and all necessary parties within five 
working days of adoption. 
Ordinance No. 4475 - Page 1 of 2 Agenda Bill: 08050 
Section 6. 
Section 7. 
The Community Development Department shall transmit copies of this 
Ordinance and all other required materials to all public utilities and 
telecommunications utilities affected by this Ordinance in accordance with ORS 
222.005. 
Emergency Clause. The Council finds that immediate adoption of this ordinance 
is necessary to meet State of Oregon filing requirements for having the annexed 
property placed on the City's property tax rolls beginning in Fiscal Year 2008-09. 
First Reading March 17, 2008 
Date 
Second Reading and Passed March 17, 2008 
Date 
Approved by the Mayor _ j j ^ z A a m l 
Date 
Ordinance No. 4 4 75 - Page 2 of 2 
VICINITY MAP ORDINANCE NO. 4475 EXHIBIT A 
City of Beaverton 
9217 SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy 
1/28/08 N 
A Tax Lot #'s 1S114AB03700 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
Planning Services Division 
Application # 
ANX2008-0002 
EXHIBIT B 
City of Beaverton ORDINANCE 
NO. 4475 Engineering Department 
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
FOR 
THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 11 "CLUB MEADOW" (TAX LOT 1S114AB03700) 
ANNEXATION 2008-002 
EXPLANATION: THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PREPARED FOR THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF 
REVENUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING A PARCEL OF LAND TO BE ANNEXED FROM 
WASHINGTON COUNTY TO THE CITY OF BEAVERTON, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 
BEAVERTON- HILLSDALE HIGHWAY WEST OF 91st AVENUE. SAID PARCEL IS WITHIN THE 
SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS "CLUB MEADOW" RECORDED JULY 14, 1926, IN BOOK 8, PAGE 30 OF 
RECORDS OF PUTS. 
LYING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 
WEST, W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, BEING THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 11, OF 
"CLUB MEADOW" SUBDIVISION, IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OREGON, 
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 
COMMENCING FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY WEST CORNER AND INITIAL POINT OF THE 
ANTHONY HART D.L.C., 60; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID D.L.C., 60 SOUTH 
85°05'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 465.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING THE 
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID "CLUB MEADOW" SUBDIVISION PER BOOK 8, PAGE 
30 OF RECORDS OF PLATS AND ALSO BEING A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 11; 
THENCE NORTH 01°58'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.90 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE; THENCE 
SOUTH 86°01'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 61.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11; 
THENCE SOUTH 01°58'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.09 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY 
LINE OF BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HIGHWAY ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 11; 
THENCE NORTH 88°26'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 59.30 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 
LINE, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 11; THENCE NORTH 00°08'00" EAST, A DISTANCE 
OF 73.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING 
HAVING AN AREA OF 6,781 SQUARE FEET OR 0.16 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 
SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. 
BASIS OF BEARING: IS SOUTH 85°05'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 
ANTHONY HART D.L.C., 60, AS SHOWN ON MAP IN BOOK 8, PAGE 30 RECORDS OF PLATS, IN 
WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. 
EXHIBIT B 
ANNEXATION 2008-002 EXHIBIT MAP 
SITUATED IN LOT 11, BLOCK 1 OF "CLUB MEADOW" 
NW 1 / 4 , NE 1 / 4 SECTION 14, T.1S., R.1W., W.M., 
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
ORDINANCE 
NO. 4475 
p r o f e s s i o n a l 
LAND SURVEYOR 
O R E G O N 
JULY 26.1960 
DAVID A. WINSJ-HP 
2165 
LOT 12 CLUB 
MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
SW COR 
-ANTHONY HART 
D.L.C. 60 
P.O.C. 
WASHINGTON 
COUNTY 
P.O.B. 
^ 0 ^ 0 0 X 465.50 
SW COR OF EX. 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
CITY OF BEAVERTON 
b 
„0 
oo 
io 
Lu 
b 
o 
oo p 
b 
NORTH 1/2 LOT 11 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
WASHINGTON 
COUNTY 
_S86'Q1 '46 "r 
~ 61.70' 
NORTH 
11-40' 
SOUTH 1/2 LOT 11 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION : 
o 
oo LOT 11 
6,781 S.F 
0.16 ACRES 
/ 59. JO' 
SOUTH 1/2 LOT 10 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
" WASHINGTON 
§ COUNTY 
oo 
to 
LN88'26'00"W 
S. W. BEA VERTON - HILLSDALE HWY 
Y:\SURV\mQrtin\2008\QnnexQtions\anx2008-002\anx-2008-002.dwq SHEET 1 OF 1 
City of Beaverton 
EXHIBIT M A P FOR 
A N N E X A T I O N 2 0 0 8 - 0 0 2 
L E G A L DESCRIPTION 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 
ENGINEERING DIVISION 
JOB NO: 08-002 
DATE: 02.04.08 
DRAWN BY: MTS 
CHECKED BY: MTS 
APPROVED BY: 
REVISION 
REVISION-
EXHIBIT C 
CITY of BEAVERTON 
ORDINANCE 
NO. 4475 
4755 S.W. G r i f f i t h Drive , P .O. Box 4755 , Beaver ton , O R 97076 General Information (503) 526-2222 V/TDD 
TO: 
AGENDA DATE: 
FROM: 
SUBJECT: 
ACTIONS: 
NAC: 
REPORT DATE: 3/10/08 
STAFF REPORT 
City Council 
March17, 2008 
Jeff Salvon, AICP, Associate Planner 
Community Development Department 
Expedited Annexation (ANX2008-0002) 
Annexation to the City of Beaverton of one parcel located at 9217 
SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway. The property proposed for 
annexation is identified as parcel 1S114AB03700 as shown on the 
attached map, and more particularly described by the attached 
legal description (Attachment A). Annexation of this property is 
owner initiated and is being processed as an expedited annexation 
under ORS 222.125 and Metro Code 3.09.045. 
This property is located adjacent to the boundary of the Denny 
Whitford / Raleigh West Neighborhood Association Committee 
(NAC). The Neighborhood Office is recommending that staff 
include a provision in the ordinance to amend the Denny Whitford / 
Raleigh West NAC boundary to include the subject parcel. 
AREA: The parcel totals approximately 0.16 acres 
TAXABLE ASSESSED VALUE: $ 348,300 
ASSESSOR'S REAL MARKET VALUE: 
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 
$ 529,760 
EXISTING COUNTY ZONE: The subject parcel is designated Office Commercial (OC) by 
Washington County. 
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt an ordinance 
annexing the referenced property, with an effective date 
delayed to May 21, 2008 in order to comply with ORS 
222.040 which restricts municipal boundary changes from 
occurring 90 days prior to the date of a primary election. 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
BACKGROUND 
The subject property supports a building of approximately 3,300 square feet divided into 
three retail units. Two units are occupied and support a tattoo parlor and a coffee shop. 
The third unit is vacant. The parcel is currently zoned Washington County Office 
Commercial (OC). In previous attempts to improve the property, the owner found that 
restrictions associated with this zoning limited the ability to apply building related 
improvements. In petitioning to annex into the City of Beaverton, the owner hopes to 
satisfy two objectives. 
First, the property owner wants more flexibility to make improvements to the property 
without restrictions dictated by the property's zoning. The owner realizes that 
annexation into the City will not in itself accomplish this goal. However, subsequent to 
annexation and the annexation related Plan and Zone amendments which will 
accompany this annexation, the owner intends to pursue a rezone of the property from 
the City's OC district to the City's CS district. Although there is no guarantee that this 
subsequent proposal will be granted, the owner feels that the change will be consistent 
with the City's zoning in the area and is willing to assume a certain amount of risk. 
The second motivation involves the fact that the neighboring property to the west which 
is also owned by the property owner and currently supporting parking to serve the 
subject parcel, is within in the City boundary. Annexation of the subject parcel would 
provide the benefit of subjecting both properties to a corresponding set of standards. 
Consent to annex on the part of the landowner allows this proposal to be processed as 
an expedited annexation under ORS 222.125 and Metro Code 3.09.045 so no public 
hearing is required. In addition, in December 2004, the City and Washington County 
entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement for an Interim Urban Services Plan that 
established an area "A", in which the City could proceed with annexations without 
County consent and an area "B", in which the City would need to obtain County consent 
to proceed with annexation. The proposed annexation is in area "A" thus allowing the 
proposal to proceed without further approval on the County's part. Finally, it is 
understood that changing the property from County OC to the City's Corridor plan and 
Office Commercial (OC) zoning designations will occur through an annexation related 
non-discretionary process requiring approval by the City Council. 
EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Map and Tax Lot Site Address 
Lot 
Size 
(acres) 
Existing Land 
Use 
1S114AB03700 9215 & 9217 SW BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE 
HWY 
0 16 Retail 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
SERVICE PROVISION: 
The following analysis details the various services available to the property to be 
annexed. Cooperative, urban service and intergovernmental agreements 
affecting provision of service to the subject property are: 
• The City has entered into ORS Chapter 195 cooperative agreements with 
Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, West Slope Water 
District, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District, and Clean Water Services. 
• The City has entered into an ORS Chapter 190 intergovernmental agreement 
with Clean Water Services. 
• The City has been a party to a series of ORS Chapter 190 intergovernmental 
agreements "for Mutual Aid, Mutual Assistance, and Interagency Cooperation 
Among Law Enforcement Agencies Located in Washington County, Oregon", the 
last of which was signed by Beaverton Mayor Rob Drake on August 9, 2004. 
This agreement specifies the terms under which a law enforcement agency may 
provide assistance in response to an emergency situation outside its jurisdiction 
when requested by another law enforcement agency. 
• On December 22, 2004, the City entered into an intergovernmental agreement 
with Washington County defining areas that the City may annex for ten years 
from the date of the agreement without opposition by the County. The property 
proposed for annexation by this application is included in the areas the City may 
annex without County consent. 
This action is consistent with those agreements. 
POLICE: The property to be annexed currently receives police protection 
from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District 
(ESPD). The property will be withdrawn from the ESPD, and the 
City will provide police service upon annexation. In practice, 
whichever law enforcement agency is able to respond first, to an 
emergency, does so in accordance with the mutual aid agreement 
described above. 
FIRE: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) provides fire and 
ambulance service to the property. The City annexed its own fire 
services to TVF&R in 1995. TVF&R is designated as the long-
term service provider to this area. 
SEWER: An 8 inch pipe maintained by the City runs under Beaverton-
Hillsdale Hwy in front of the property. A lateral line serving the 
subject parcel extends off of this line. The subject parcel is 
currently being billed for maintenance services by Clean Water 
Services. Any plans to redevelop the property will involve a 
connection to existing lines requiring city permitting and 
inspection. Subsequent to annexation, the City will establish a 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
s 
billing account to recover costs associated with sewer service. 
WATER: 
STORM WATER 
DRAINAGE: 
STREETS and 
ROADS: 
PARKS and 
SCHOOLS: 
PLANNING, 
ZONING and 
BUILDING: 
West Slope Water District currently provides service to the 
property. Subsequent to annexation the West Slope Water District 
will continue to provide service to the properties and bill for 
services rendered although the City reserves the right to assume 
responsibility for provision of water service sometime in the future. 
Storm water on the subject property is directed to a City 
maintained 12" pipe within the B-H Hwy right-of-way. Runoff in 
this line flows eastward approximately 100' to a junction under the 
intersection of B-H Hwy and SW 91st Avenue. From there it is 
redirected southward under B-H Hwy with the natural grade of the 
landscape. Clean Water Services currently bills for services 
rendered. Subsequent to annexation, the City will takeover billing 
responsibilities. If the property redevelops, upgrades to the on-
site storm water drainage facilities will be required. Subsequent 
needed storm water improvements will be determined in the City's 
development review process. 
The properties are located on SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy (a 
State maintained highway classified as an arterial on the City's 
Functional Classification Map). Subsequent to annexation 
maintenance responsibilities for SW Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy will 
remain with the State. 
The proposed annexation is within the Beaverton School District 
and the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District. Because the 
proposed action does not involve residential uses, school 
enrollment will not be affected by the proposed annexation and no 
additional service demands will be imposed upon the park district. 
Subsequent to annexation, service district boundaries will remain 
unaffected and property taxes for both districts will also continue 
to be assessed. 
Washington County currently provides long-range planning, 
development review, and building inspection for the property. 
Upon annexation, the City will provide those services. City 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations will be applied to 
these parcels in a separate process. 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL 
REGIONAL ANNEXATION CRITERIA 
In December 1998 the Metro Council adopted Metro Code Chapter 3.09 (Local 
Government Boundary Changes). This Chapter was recently amended through 
Ordinance 07-1165A (adopted January 17. 2008). Metro Code Sections 3.09.045 (c) 
and (d) include the following minimum criteria for expedited annexation decisions: 
3.09.045 (c) At least seven days prior to the date of decision the City or Metro 
shall make available to the public a report that includes the following information: 
(1) The extent to which urban services are available to serve the affected 
territory, including any extra-territorial extensions of service; 
The proposal involves annexation of a single parcel of 0.16 acres containing a single 
building capable of supporting three small retail uses. Urban services are already 
provided to the subject parcel by the County and the area's special service districts. 
Given the size of the parcel, the service demands of the property are minimal. Services 
that will transfer to the City subsequent to annexation are sanitary and storm sewer 
maintenance, police protection, long-range planning, development review and building 
inspection. The proposed annexation does not entail extra-territorial extensions of 
service. 
(2) Whether the proposed boundary change will result in the withdrawal of 
the affected territory from the legal boundary of any necessary party; 
Consistent with the provisions established in the City of Beaverton - Clean Water 
Services Inter-Governmental Agreement signed July 1, 2004, the City will assume 
sanitary and storm sewer maintenance responsibilities for the property from Clean 
Water Services subsequent to annexation. Additionally, in accordance with the terms 
specified in the City of Beaverton - Washington County Urban Planning Area 
Agreement, the property will also be removed from the Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol and 
Washington County's Urban Road Maintenance Improvement District. The proposed 
annexation will not require withdrawal of territory from any of the City's other special 
service district partners identified as necessary parties. 
(3) The proposed effective date of the boundary change. 
The timing o f this annexation proposal subjects it to provisions contained in ORS 
222.040. This section of state statute dictates that changes in jurisdiction boundaries 
shall not become effective within a period of 90 days prior to a primary election. This 
year's primary election date is scheduled to occur on May 20 which will affect the 
processing of this proposal. To comply with this section of statute, staff is proposing 
that the effective dated be delayed to May 21st, 2008. Staff will proceed with this 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
expedited annexation in the interim however so that the City can respond to the 
petitioner's request that services associated with the annexation will be provided in as 
timely a manner as possible. 
3.09.045 (d) To approve a boundary change through an expedited process, the 
city shall: 
(1) Find that the change is consistent with expressly applicable provisions 
in: 
(A) Any applicable urban service agreement adopted pursuant to 
ORS 195.065; 
The Service Provision Section of this staff report addresses the provision of services in 
detail. However, although discussion with other urban services providers on the content 
of an agreement have occurred sporadically over the last several years, and the City 
has proposed an agreement that is acceptable to most of the parties, the City has not 
yet entered into an urban services provider agreement under ORS 195.065 that relates 
to all potential urban service providers in and around the City. 
As previously noted, on December 22, 2004 the City did enter into an interim 
intergovernmental agreement with Washington County, titled the "Beaverton-
Washington County Intergovernmental Agreement Interim Urban Services Plan" This 
agreement defines areas that the City may annex for ten years from the date of the 
agreement without the County's consent, and references ORS 195.065(1) among its 
recitals. The property proposed for annexation by this application is within the ten year 
annexation area. No other ORS Chapter 195 Urban Service Agreements have been 
executed that would affect this proposed annexation. 
FINDING: Staff finds that where applicable, the proposed annexation is 
consistent with urban service agreements in place as demonstrated in the staff 
report and as such the proposal satisfies Metro Code Section 3.09.045 (d)(1)(A). 
(B)Any applicable annexation plan adopted pursuant to ORS 
195.205; 
As noted previously, the City has not yet entered into an urban services provider 
agreement under ORS 195.065 that relates to all potential urban service providers in 
and around the City. Because a comprehensive urban service agreement has not been 
completed, it is not possible to consider adoption of individual annexation plans as 
provided under ORS 195.205. 
FINDING: Due to the fact that a comprehensive urban service agreement has not 
been established upon which to develop City annexation plans, staff finds that 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
1 
provisions in Metro Code Section 3.09.045 (d)(1)(B) do not apply and are therefore 
not applicable to this proposal. 
(C)Any applicable cooperative planning agreement adopted pursuant 
to ORS 195.020(2) between the affected entity and a necessary 
party: 
• As noted in the Urban Service Provision section of this report the City has 
entered into ORS Chapter 195 cooperative agreements with Washington County, 
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, West Slope Water District, Tualatin Hills 
Parks and Recreation District, and Clean Water Services. These agreements call 
for coordination of planning activities between each service district and the City, 
although annexations are not subject to coordination under the agreement 
language. However, as necessary parties, the subject districts have been 
notified of this proposed annexation. 
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed annexation is not subject to existing 
cooperative agreements. 
(D)Any applicable public facility plan adopted pursuant to a 
statewide planning goal on public facilities and services; 
The City's public facilities plan consists of the Public Facilities and Services Element of 
the Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the 
City's Capital Improvements Plan, and the most recent versions of master plans 
adopted by providers of the following facilities and services in the City: storm water 
drainage, potable water, sewerage conveyance and processing, parks and recreation, 
schools and transportation. Where a service is provided by a jurisdiction other than the 
City, by adopting the master plan for that jurisdiction as part of its public facilities plan, 
the City has essentially agreed to abide by any provisions of that master plan. The 
property proposed for annexation does not involve changes to facilities that would 
significantly affect the public facilities plans of applicable service districts for the area. 
No relevant urban services as defined by Metro Code Section 3.09.020(1) will change 
subsequent to this annexation 
Staff could not identify any provisions in the Washington County Public Facilities Plan 
relevant to this proposed annexation. 
FINDING: Staff finds that the proposed annexation is consistent with applicable 
Public Facility Plans and therefore satisfies Metro Code Criterion 3.09.045 
(d)(1)(D). 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
13 
(E) Any applicable comprehensive plan; 
The only relevant policy of the City of Beaverton's Comprehensive Plan is Policy 
5.3.1 .d, which states "The City shall seek to eventually incorporate its entire Urban 
Services Area." The subject territory is within Beaverton's Assumed Urban Services 
Area, which is Figure V-1 of the City of Beaverton's Acknowledged Comprehensive 
Plan. 
In reviewing the Washington County Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban 
Area on the County's web site (reflecting changes through County Ordinance No. 686) 
that amended the Comprehensive Framework Plan, staff finds that the following 
provisions may be applicable to this proposed annexation: 
• A paragraph in the "County-Wide Development Concept" at the beginning of the 
Comprehensive Framework Plan which states: 
As development occurs in accordance with this development concept, issues of 
annexation or incorporation may arise. Annexation or incorporation issues will 
necessarily relate to various other planning issues such as community identity, fiscal 
impacts of growth and service provision, coordination between service providers to 
achieve efficiencies and ensure availability, etc. As such issues arise; the County 
should evaluate community identity as an issue of equal importance with public 
service provision issues when developing policy positions on specific annexation or 
incorporation proposals. 
Staff views this statement as direction to the County itself in how to evaluate annexation 
proposals, and not guidance to the City regarding this specific proposal. As a 
necessary party, the County has an opportunity to comment on and appeal this 
proposed boundary change if they believe the boundary change is inconsistent with the 
approval criteria (see Metro Code Section 3.09). 
• Policy 15 of the Comprehensive Framework Plan, relating to Roles and 
Responsibilities for Serving Growth, says: 
It is the policy of Washington County to work with service providers, including cities 
and special service districts, and Metro, to ensure that facilities and services 
required for growth will be provided when needed by the agency or agencies best 
able to do so in a cost effective and efficient manner. 
Two implementing strategies under Policy 15 that relate to annexation state: 
The County will: 
f. If appropriate in the future, enter into agreements with service providers which 
address one or more of the following: 
3. Service district or city annexation 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
u 
g. Not oppose proposed annexations to a city that are consistent with an urban 
service agreement or a voter approved annexation plan. 
The City of Beaverton, Washington County and the other urban service providers for the 
subject area worked off and on for several years to arrive at an urban service area 
agreement for the Beaverton area pursuant to ORS 195.065 that would be consistent 
with Policy 15 and the cited implementing strategies. Unfortunately, although most 
issues were resolved, a few issues remained between the County and the City that 
prevented completion of the agreement. These issues do not relate to who provides 
services or whether they can be provided when needed in an efficient and cost effective 
manner so much as how the transfer of service provision responsibility occurs, 
particularly the potential transfer of employees and equipment from the County to the 
City. As previously noted the County and the City have entered into an 
intergovernmental agreement that sets an interim urban services plan area in which the 
County commits to not oppose annexations by the City. 
Finally, staff has reviewed other elements of the County Comprehensive Plan, 
particularly the Raleigh Hills - Garden Home Community Plan, and identified an Area of 
Special Concern that pertains to the subject parcel. The relevant section specifies the 
following: 
Land designated for commercial uses adjacent to Canyon Road and Beaverton-Hillsdale 
Highway comprises Area of Special Concern K. In order to promote the elimination of 
those strip commercial features which are vehicle and pedestrian traffic safety hazards 
and the addition of features which will enhance the business advantage and overall 
appearance of the subarea, the following standards shall apply to development of 
structures, land divisions and significant remodeling of existing structures within this 
Area. 
a. Access drives and curb cuts shall be consolidated and, if feasible, shared between 
adjoining parcels. 
b. Where no curb cuts onto Canyon Road or Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway now exist, 
new direct access shall be allowed only for an interim use until alternative access is 
completed, pursuant to access management provisions in the Comprehensive 
Framework Plan and Community Development Code. 
c. A safe and convenient means of pedestrian circulation shall be provided to each use. 
The pedestrian system shall provide access from each use to the property line of 
adjacent uses and from the use to the nearest public transit facility or stop. The design of 
new pedestrian facilities shall complement the design of those already constructed in 
adjacent uses. 
d. A landscape buffer area shall be established and maintained along that portion of the 
property abutting SLV Canyon Road or Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway. This landscaping 
shall be done at least to the level of the Type I Screening and Buffering Standards in the 
Community Development Code. 
e. Business identification and directional signs shall be brought into conformance with 
sign standards in the Community Development Code and consolidated whenever 
feasible. 
f. Office commercial use of two parcels at the northwest corner of the intersection of Sl/V 
Poplar Lane and Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway (tax lots 8000 and 8100) shall be 
permitted contingent upon the following strict design criteria: Commercial use of these 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
1 c X tj 
parcels shall be integrated with the existing office commercial area immediately to the 
west (White Fir Plaza, tax lot 100), utilizing that lot's existing access onto Beaverton-
Hilisdale Highway for joint access. Screening and buffering of these parcels to the north 
and east shall be consistent with Type IV standards in the Community Development 
Code. No access shall be allowed onto SW Poplar Lane until tax lots 8000 and 8100 are 
redeveloped. Upon redevelopment, all three lots shall be served by joint access limited to 
one point onto Poplar Lane and the existing access onto Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway 
shall be removed. 
g. In order to prevent encroachment into the adjacent residential neighborhood, 
development of the rear portion of the parcel at 8600 SW Canyon Road (tax lot 100) for 
General Commercial use shall be permitted only with the following design controls: No 
access onto SW Milton Lane shall be allowed. Screening and buffering of the property 
shall be done to the level of Type 2 standards of the Community Development Code, with 
the addition of Type S-2 fencing. Lighting, if any, shall be directional to minimize impacts 
on the adjacent neighborhood. Any development of this lot shall pay special attention to 
improvement of drainage problems in this area. 
The City of Beaverton requires that development proposals on recently annexed 
properties along the Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway that fall within Areas of Concern 
address the criteria on a case-by-case basis. Such was the case with three 
development proposals for properties located on Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy just east of 
the subject parcel (specifically, property that supports a US Bank branch, the Human 
Bean espresso bar, and an commercial/office development currently in the 
predevelopment stages). In each case, specific design elements identified in the 
Raleigh Hills - Garden Home Community Plan were required and incorporated into the 
design of the proposed developments. 
As with the developments cited above, redevelopment plans pertaining to the subject 
parcel will be required to address consolidated curb cuts, pedestrian circulation, 
landscape buffering, signage, and design specifications reflecting the standards 
indicated above. 
FINDING. Staff finds that the proposed annexation is consistent with applicable 
provisions contained in the City's of Beaverton's Comprehensive Plan and 
Washington County's Framework Plan and Raleigh Hills - Garden Home 
Community Plan. The proposed amendment therefore satisfies Metro Code 
Criterion 3.09.045 (d)(1)(E). 
(2) Consider whether the boundary change would: 
(A) Promote the timely, orderly and economic provision of public 
facilities and services; 
The existing conditions section of this staff report contains information addressing this 
criterion in detail. As indicated, changes that affect public facility and services provision 
to individual properties are generally subject to agreements between the City of 
Beaverton, Washington County, and special districts. These agreements address which 
urban service provider will assume responsibilities for service in the event of a boundary 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
16 
change. By entering into these agreements and through the adoption of planning 
documents the City and its service district partners have attempted to ensure that the 
provision of services subsequent to the proposed boundary change will be timely, 
orderly, and economically viable. 
FINDING. Staff finds that for the reasons indicated above, changes in service 
provision occurring subsequent to the proposed boundary change have been 
adequately anticipated and planned for. The proposed amendment therefore 
satisfies Metro Code Criterion 3.09.045 (d)(2)(A). 
(B) Affect the quality and quantity of urban services; 
The existing conditions section of this staff report contains information addressing this 
criterion in detail. As indicated, responsibilities pertaining to the provision of public 
facilities and services will either remain unchanged or transfer to the City. In general, 
because cities provide services on an urban scale, they can provide services at a level 
equal or higher than provided to unincorporated areas. Accordingly, the City is 
generally regarded as offering a level of service to properties that annex from 
unincorporated County that is equal or higher than what was previously received. 
Annexation to the City of Beaverton will therefore benefit the quality and quantity of 
urban services transferred to the City.. 
FINDING: The proposed annexation will generally have a beneficial affect on the 
quality and quantity of urban service. Criterion 3.09.045(d)(2)(B) has been met. 
(C)Eliminate or avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities or 
services. 
The intent of the intergovernmental agreements alluded to in the current condition 
section of this report is to clarify which agency bears responsibility for the provision of 
urban services in specific areas of the City and in circumstances of a jurisdictional 
boundary transfer. These agreements therefore fulfill the role of attempting to eliminate 
duplication of services where jurisdictional responsibilities may be unclear. The issue of 
duplication has therefore been addressed and resolved through these agreements. 
FINDING: As the proposed annexation is subject to the terms established by 
established service agreements between the City and its special district service 
providers, provisions have been made to avoid unnecessary duplication of 
facilities or services involving the subject parcel. Criterion 3.09.045(d)(2)(C) has 
been met. 
PROCESS 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
17 
ORDINANCE NO. 4478 
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORD. 4187 FIGURE 111-1 
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP TO 
APPLY THE CITY'S CORRIDOR PLAN DESIGNATION 
AND ORD. 2050 THE ZONING MAP TO APPLY THE 
CITY'S OFFICE COMMERCIAL (OC) ZONE TO A 
PARCEL LOCATED AT 9217 SW BEAVERTON 
HILLSDALE HIGHWAY IN NORTHEAST BEAVERTON. 
CPA 2008-0001/ZMA 2008-0001, CITY OF BEAVERTON 
APPLICANT 
WHEREAS, a proposal to annex the subject property into the City of Beaverton was approved 
by the City Council on March 17, 2008; and 
WHEREAS, section 10.40.2 of the Development Code specifies that "[t]he City may consider 
the zoning for any area proposed for annexation at the same time as it considers 
annexation of the area...", and 
WHEREAS, the Washington County - City of Beaverton Urban Planning Area Agreement 
specifies that "upon annexation the City agrees to convert County plan and 
zoning designations to City plan and zoning designations which most closely 
approximate the density, use provisions and standards of the County 
designations"; and 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 4187 Section 1.4.3.B.6 and Ordinance 2050 Section 
40.97.15.C, the Beaverton Planning Services Division, on March 24, 2008 
published a written staff report with findings and recommendations demonstrating 
applicability of the UPAA to the proposed action a minimum seven (7) calendar 
days in advance of the scheduled City Council meeting on April 7, 2008; and, 
WHEREAS, the City Council adopts as to criteria, facts and findings described in Community 
Development Department staff report on CPA2008-0001/ZMA2008-0001 by 
Associate Planner Jeff Salvon, dated March 24, 2008, and attached hereto as 
Exhibit "B"; now, therefore, 
THE CITY OF BEAVERTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 
Section 1. Ordinance No. 4187, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, is amended to 
designate the subject properties on Map and Tax Lot 1S1 14 AB 03700 Corridor, 
as shown on Exhibit "A". 
Section 2. Ordinance No. 2050, the Zoning Map, is amended to designate the properties on 
Map and Tax Lots 1S1 14 AB 03700 Office Commercial, as shown on Exhibit "A" 
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective on May 21, 2008. 
First reading this 7 t h day of A p r i l 2008. 
Ordinance No. 4478 - Page 1 Agenda Bill No: 08058 
Passed by the Council this 14th day of April , 2008. 
Approved by the Mayor this day of _ ,2008. 
ATTEST) I 
SUE/NELSON, City Recorder ROB DRAKE, Mayor 
Ordinance No. 4478 - Page 2 
MEADOW 
MEADOW 
BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HIGHWAY 
Legend 
- CITY LIMITS 
1 BEAVERTON 
Location 
Proposal: 
Comprehensive Plan Map 
Amendment: 
Apply Corridor Designation 
Zoning Map Amendment: 
Apply Office Commercial (OC) 
03/03/08 
9217 SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy Tax Lot #'s 
1S114AB03700 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
Planning Services Division City of Beaverton 
VICINITY MAP - ^ EXHIBIT "A 
I 
« 
EXHIBIT "B" 
Ordinance No: 4478 
CITY of BEAVERTON 
TO: 
AGENDA DATE: 
FROM: 
APPLICATIONS: 
LOCATION: 
NEIGHBORHOOD 
ASSOCIATION: 
REQUEST: 
4755 S.W. G r i f f i t h Drive, P .O. Box 4755 , Beaver ton , O R 97076 General Information (503) 526-2222 V/TDD 
STAFF REPORT 
City Council 
April 7, 2008 REPORT DATE: March 24, 2008 
Jeff Salvon, Associate Planner 
CPA2008-0001 
(9217 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Highway Land Use Map 
Amendment) 
ZMA2008-0001 
(9217 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Highway Zoning Map 
Amendment) 
SW Beaverton Hillsdale Highway approximately 100 feet west 
of SW 91st Avenue in east Beaverton. The parcel is identified 
as 1S114AB03700. 
Denney Whitford / Raleigh West Neighborhood Association 
Committee 
Apply the City's Corridor (COR) land use designation and the 
City's Office Commercial (OC) zoning designation to the 
subject parcel. 
APPLICANT: City of Beaverton Community Development Director 
APPROVAL Comprehensive Plan Section 1.5.2 and the Development 
CRITERIA. Code Section 40.97.15.3.C 
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt an ordinance 
applying the Corridor (COR) land use designation and the 
Office Commercial (OC) zoning designation to the subject 
parcel effective upon its annexation on May 21, 2008. 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
BACKGROUND 
CPA2008-0001 proposes amendment of the Land Use Map and ZMA2008-0001 
proposes amendment of the Zoning Map. Both amendments are requested in order to 
apply City land use and zoning to the subject parcel which is currently annexing into the 
City. The parcel currently carries the Washington County Office Commercial (OC) 
designation, as depicted on the County's Raleigh Hills - Garden Home Community Plan 
Map. 
EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Uses. Staff performed a field survey and observed the parcel supports a building of 
approximately 3,300 square feet divided among three retail tenants. Two units are 
occupied and support a tattoo parlor and a coffee shop. The third unit is vacant. 
Character. The subject parcel is located on the Beaverton Hillsdale Highway, a state 
maintained street classified on the City's Functional Classification Map as an arterial. 
The development along this segment of highway is characterized as strip commercial 
and is exemplified by retail shops, convenience stores, fast food franchises, and offices. 
Off-street parking is typically situated along the street frontage and buildings are set 
back to the rear of the property. Development behind those properties fronting 
Beaverton Hillsdale Highway is single family residential in nature. 
Natural Resources. Washington County's Raleigh Hills - Garden Home Community 
Plan map does not depict any significant natural resources on the subject parcel 
ANALYSIS 
COMPATIBILITY OF LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 
In 2000, Washington County adopted Ordinance 561 which amended the 
Comprehensive Framework Plan, to include a regional planning section for urban areas. 
This section identifies a number of Metro 2040 Growth Concept Design Types and 
includes a series of maps that identify the general location of these land use 
designations. 
Policy 40 contains a map identifying areas assigned the Transit Corridor designation. 
The subject parcel is identified as falling within this design type. Text describing Transit 
Corridors is as follows: "Transit Corridors generally include areas along transit routes 
that have or will have frequent service. Transit Corridor development will include a mix 
of complementary land uses, including rowhouses, duplexes, apartments, office or retail 
buildings, institutional uses and mixed commercial and residential uses. Commercial 
and office uses will be allowed at specific points along the Transit Corridors and not in a 
linear matter that promotes strip commercial development and traffic congestion. 
Collectively, these land uses will generate increased pedestrian and transit ridership. 
Therefore, these areas will feature a high-quality pedestrian environment with wider 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
6 
sidewalks and pedestrian amenities. Transit Corridors will evolve into environments 
that provide for walking, cycling and transit. Mixed-use development will enhance the 
vitality of businesses since they can provide services for employees during the day and 
goods and services to area residents during the evening." 
Section 3.2 of the City of Beaverton Comprehensive Plan defines Corridors using the 
Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan definition as "Corridors - along good 
quality transit lines, corridors feature a high-quality pedestrian environment, convenient 
access to transit, and somewhat higher than current densities." 
Thus, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation of Corridor is an appropriate and 
most closely approximates the County designation of Transit Corridor as applied via 
Washington County Ordinance 561. 
COMPATABILITY OF ZONING DISTRICTS 
The subject property is designated with the County Office Commercial (OC) land use 
district. Section 312 of the County Community Development Code states: 
"The intent of this district is to encourage office complex development of 
institutional, professional, medical/dental, governmental and other office business 
uses. The purpose is to accommodate the increasing office needs in complexes 
ranging in size from small to large-scale development. Office uses are the 
primary use of the District. To serve the employees of the office complex, some 
accessory commercial and high density residential uses may be permitted 
through a Planned Development process." 
The excerpt, from the Washington County - Beaverton Urban Planning Area Agreement 
(UPAA) below, specifies that the County's OC land use designation is equivalent to the 
City's OC zoning designation 
WASHINGTON COUNTY- BEA VERTON 
URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT 
EXHIBIT "B" 
CITY-COUNTY LAND USE DES/GNA TION EQUIVALENTS 
COUNTY BEA VERTON 
Plan/Zonina Plan 
Office Commercial Office Commercial 
Zonina 
OC 
Summary. Washington County Ordinance 561 specifies this area as Transit Corridor 
which corresponds directly with the City's Corridor land use designation adopted 
through Ordinance 4125. Additionally, the UPAA specifies the City's OC zoning district 
as the closest proximate zoning for the property. 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY 
Special Policy II.A. of the UPAA states in part, "...the COUNTY will advise the CITY of 
adopted policies which apply to the annexed areas and the CITY shall determine 
whether CITY adoption is appropriate and act accordingly." The County has not 
advised the city of adopted policies which may apply to the annexed area. 
However, SUBAREA 3, Specific Design Element 5 of the Raleigh Hills - Garden Home 
Community Plan relates in particular to this area. It specifies the following: 
5. Land designated for commercial uses adjacent to Canyon Road and Beaverton-
Hillsdale Highway comprises Area of Special Concern K. In order to promote the 
elimination of those strip commercial features which are vehicle and pedestrian traffic 
safety hazards and the addition of features which will enhance the business advantage 
and overall appearance of the subarea, the following standards shall apply to 
development of structures, land divisions and significant remodeling of existing structures 
within this Area. 
a. Access drives and curb cuts shall be consolidated and, if feasible, shared between 
adjoining parcels. 
b. Where no curb cuts onto Canyon Road or Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway now exist, 
new direct access shall be allowed only for an interim use until alternative access is 
completed, pursuant to access management provisions in the Comprehensive 
Framework Plan and Community Development Code. 
c. A safe and convenient means of pedestrian circulation shall be provided to each use. 
The pedestrian system shall provide access from each use to the property line of 
adjacent uses and from the use to the nearest public transit facility or stop. The design of 
new pedestrian facilities shall complement the design of those already constructed in 
adjacent uses. 
d. A landscape buffer area shall be established and maintained along that portion of the 
property abutting SW Canyon Road or Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway. This landscaping 
shall be done at least to the level of the Type I Screening and Buffering Standards in the 
Community Development Code. 
e. Business identification and directional signs shall be brought into conformance with 
sign standards in the Community Development Code and consolidated whenever 
feasible. 
f. Office commercial use of two parcels at the northwest corner of the intersection of SW 
Poplar Lane and Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway (tax lots 8000 and 8100) shall be 
permitted contingent upon the following strict design criteria: Commercial use of these 
parcels shall be integrated with the existing office commercial area immediately to the 
west (White Fir Plaza, tax lot 100), utilizing that lot's existing access onto Beaverton-
Hillsdale Highway for joint access. Screening and buffering of these parcels to the north 
and east shall be consistent with Type IV standards in the Community Development 
Code. No access shall be allowed onto SW Poplar Lane until tax lots 8000 and 8100 are 
redeveloped. Upon redevelopment, all three lots shall be served by joint access limited to 
one point onto Poplar Lane and the existing access onto Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway 
shall be removed. 
g. In order to prevent encroachment into the adjacent residential neighborhood, 
development of the rear portion of the parcel at 8600 S W Canyon Road (tax lot 100) for 
General Commercial use shall be permitted only with the following design controls: No 
access onto S W Milton Lane shall be allowed. Screening and buffering of the property 
shall be done to the level of Type 2 standards of the Community Development Code, with 
the addition of Type S-2 fencing. Lighting, if any, shall be directional to minimize impacts 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
on the adjacent neighborhood. Any development of this lot shall pay special attention to 
improvement of drainage problems in this area. 
The City of Beaverton requires that development proposals on recently annexed 
properties along the Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway falling within County specified Areas 
of Concern address the Community Plan design criteria on a case-by-case basis. Such 
was the case with three development proposals for properties located on Beaverton-
Hillsdale Hwy just east of the subject parcel (specifically, property that supports a US 
Bank branch, the Human Bean espresso bar, and a commercial/office development 
currently in the predevelopment stages). In each case, specific design elements 
identified in the Raleigh Hills - Garden Home Community Plan were required and 
incorporated into the design of the proposed developments. 
As with the developments cited above, redevelopment plans pertaining to the subject 
parcel will be required to address consolidated curb cuts, pedestrian circulation, 
landscape buffering, signage, and design specifications reflecting the standards 
indicated above. 
PROCESS 
THRESHOLD 
The subject property is designated on the County's Raleigh Hills - Garden Home 
Community Plan Map as Office Commercial, which, in a non-discretionary process, 
requires that the City apply the terms specified in the Beaverton-Washington County 
Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA). Specifically, the City must apply plan and 
zone designations which most closely approximate Washington County designations 
applied to the property. The proposed zone change from County Office Commercial 
(OC) to City Office Commercial (OC) conforms to this requirement. 
Policy 40 of Washington County's Comprehensive Framework Plan shows that the 
Transit Corridor Design Type has also been applied to the property. The proposed plan 
map change from the County Transit Corridor design type to the City's Corridor plan 
designation also conforms to the UPAA requirement that the City apply the plan map 
designation which most closely approximates Washington County designation. 
Comprehensive Plan Process. Non-discretionary amendments are amendments to 
the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to add annexed property to the Map with a 
Land Use Map designation assigned through direct application of the UPAA. County 
Ordinance 561 amended Washington County's Comprehensive Framework Plan to 
apply Metro 2040 design type designations to particular areas of the County. This 
includes the application of Transit Corridor to the subject parcel. The Transit Corridor 
Design Type designation was adopted after the UPAA was adopted in 1989 and no 
updates to the agreement have been adopted since that time. Because both the City 
Corridor and County Transit Corridor land use designations were adopted pursuant to 
the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan requirements and contain similar 
language, application of the City's Corridor plan designation to the subject property 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
therefore constitutes the closest proximate plan designation to Washington County's 
Transit Corridor design type and satisfies the requirements specified in the UPAA. The 
proposed plan map amendment therefore satisfies the Non-Discretionary Annexation 
Related threshold requirements and no interpretation or exercise of discretion is 
necessary to identify Corridor as the appropriate plan designation for the property. 
Development Code Process. Due to annexation of the subject parcel and the non-
discretionary nature of the proposal, review and approval of this proposed Zoning Map 
Amendment qualifies as a Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map 
Amendment per Development Code Section 40.97 15.3.A, which states that, "An 
application for Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment shall be 
required when the following thresholds apply: 
1 "The change of zoning to a City zoning designation as a result of annexation 
of land into the City." 
2. "The Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) is specific as to the City zoning 
designation to be applied to the parcel being annexed and does not allow for 
discretion." 
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 
According to Development Code Section 40.97.15.3.D. "an application for a Non-
Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment shall be made by the 
submittal of a valid annexation petition or an executed annexation agreement". The 
annexation of the subject property was owner initiated with consent of the property 
owner and electors under ORS 222.125, and a petition for annexation was submitted. 
The annexation associated with this proposal was approved by the Beaverton City 
Council on March 17, 2008. Pursuant to ORS 222.040 which restricts municipal 
boundary changes prior to a primary election, the annexation will become effective on 
May 21, 2008. Proposed plan and zone amendments will be effective upon annexation 
of the subject parcel. 
PUBLIC NOTICE 
Section 1.4.3.A of the Comprehensive Plan prescribes the notice to be provided for 
these types of applications. 
Notice for Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Comprehensive Plan Map 
Amendments must be provided, as indicated below, not less than twenty (20) and not 
more than forty (40) calendar days prior to when the item first appears on the City 
Council's agenda. 
1 Legal notice was published in the Beaverton Valley Times on March 6, 2008 and 
again on April 3, 2008 with notification of a change in scheduling. 
2. Notice was mailed to the Denney Whitford / Raleigh West Neighborhood 
Association Committee, West Slope / Raleigh Hills / Garden Home Citizen 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
Participation Organization (CPO 3), Chair of the Committee for Citizen 
Involvement (CCI), the Washington County Department of Land Use and 
Transportation (DLUT), and to the subject property owner on March 5, 2008 and 
again on March 25, 2008 to notify of a change in scheduling. 
3. Notice was posted on the City's website on March 6, 2008 and again on March 
26, 2008. 
The City Council has not directed staff to provide additional notice for this amendment 
beyond the notices described above. The notice requirements for this CPA/ZMA have 
been met. 
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL 
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA 
Comprehensive Plan Section 1.5.2.A specifies that non-discretionary annexation related 
map amendments need not comply with Plan criteria because they are not land use 
decisions under Oregon Statutes and are those stipulated by Exhibit "B" of the Urban 
Planning Area Agreement. Findings to address Comprehensive Plan sections which 
address Statewide Planning Goals and Metro Urban Growth Regional Framework Plan 
criteria are therefore regarded as not applicable to this proposal. 
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CRITERIA 
Development Code Section 40.97.15.3. C., which contains Non-Discretionary 
Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment Approval Criteria, states: 
"In order to approve a Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment 
application, the decision making authority shall make findings of fact based on evidence 
provided by the applicant demonstrating that all the following criteria are satisfied:" 
1. The proposal satisfies the threshold requirements for a Non Discretionary 
Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment application. 
Section 40.97.15.3.A. Threshold, states. 
"An application for Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment shall be required when 
one or more of the following thresholds apply 
1 The change of zoning to a City zoning designation as a result of annexation of 
land into the City. 
2. The Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) is specific as to the City zoning 
designation to be applied to the parcel being annexed and does not allow for 
discretion " 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
The zone change is requested in order to apply City land use and zoning to the subject 
parcel in the process of annexing into the City. The parcel carries the Washington 
County Office Commercial (OC) designation, as depicted on the County's Raleigh Hills 
- Garden Home Community Plan Map. 
As noted in the Process section of this report, the UPAA specifies a City OC zoning 
designation for the County OC designation. Therefore, no discretion is required in 
determining the appropriate zoning designation. 
Finding: Staff finds that the request satisfies the threshold requirements for a 
Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map Amendment 
application. 
2. All City application fees related to the application under consideration by 
the decision making authority have been submitted. 
The City is assuming the role of the applicant in this proposed zoning map amendment. 
Fees have not been submitted for review of the application as the City does not require 
collection of fees from itself. 
Finding: Staff finds that this c riterion is not applicable. 
3. The proposal contains all applicable application submittal requirements as 
specified in Section 50.25.1 of the Development Code. 
Development Code Section 50.25.1 states, "Non-Discretionary Annexation Related 
Zoning Map Amendment and Discretionary Annexation Zoning Map Amendment 
applications processed by the City shall be determined to be complete upon submittal of 
a valid annexation petition or executed annexation agreement." The subject property 
was petitioned with the owners' consent under ORS 222.125. City Council approved 
the owner-initiated annexation on March 17, 2008 and it becomes effective on May 21, 
2008. This proposed rezone would become effective concurrent with the annexation on 
May 21, 2008. 
Finding: Staff finds that the request satisfies the application submittal 
requirements for a Non-Discretionary Annexation Related Zoning Map 
Amendment application. 
4. The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the Washington 
County - Beaverton UPAA. 
As noted in the Analysis section of this report, the UPAA is specific for the proposed 
amendment. Washington County Office Commercial goes to City Office Commercial. 
Finding: The OC zoning district is specified by, and is therefore consistent with, 
the Washington County - Beaverton UPAA. 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
5. Applications and documents related to the request, which will require 
further City approval, shall be submitted to the City in proper sequence. 
No further applications and documents are required of this request. 
Finding: Staff find s that this criterion is not applicable. 
CONCLUSION 
Based on the facts and findings presented, staff concludes that amending the 
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to depict the City's Corridor land use designation 
and amending the City's Zoning Map to depict the City's Office Commercial (OC) zoning 
district is appropriate for the subject parcels and is consistent with the Washington 
County - Beaverton Urban Planning Area Agreement. 
CPA2008-0001 / ZMA2008-0001 
Report Date: March 24, 2008 
• Consistent with Metro Code Section 3.09.045, the City sent notice of the proposed 
annexation on February 22, 2008 (24 days prior to the date of decision) to all 
necessary parties including Washington County, Metro, affected special districts 
and County service districts. 
• The notice and a copy of this staff report will be posted on the City's web page on 
March 10, 2008 (7 days prior to the date of decision). 
CONCLUSION 
Based on the facts and findings in this report, staff concludes that approval of 
the owner initiated annexation of parcel # 1S114AB03700 meets all pertinent 
criteria outlined in Metro Section 3.09.045. 
Attachments: A) Legal Description 
B) City Annexation Policies 
ANX 2008-0002 
3/17/08 Agenda Date 
18 
ATTACHMENT A 
City of Beaverton 
Engineering Department 
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
FOR 
THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 11 "CLUB MEADOW" (TAX LOT 1S114AB03700) 
ANNEXATION 2008-002 
EXPLANATION: THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PREPARED FOR THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF 
REVENUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING A PARCEL OF LAND TO BE ANNEXED FROM 
WASHINGTON COUNTY TO THE CITY OF BEAVERTON, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 
BEAVERTON- HILLSDALE HIGHWAY WEST OF 91s t AVENUE. SAID PARCEL IS WITHIN THE 
SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS "CLUB MEADOW" RECORDED JULY 14, 1926, IN BOOK 8, PAGE 30 OF 
RECORDS OF PLATS. 
LYING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 
WEST, W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, BEING THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 11, OF 
"CLUB MEADOW" SUBDIVISION, IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OREGON, 
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 
COMMENCING FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY WEST CORNER AND INITIAL POINT OF THE 
ANTHONY HART D.L.C., 60; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID D.L.C., 60 SOUTH 
85o05'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 465.50 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING THE 
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID "CLUB MEADOW" SUBDIVISION PER BOOK 8, PAGE 
30 OF RECORDS OF PLATS AND ALSO BEING A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 11; 
THENCE NORTH 01°58'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.90 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE; THENCE 
SOUTH 86°01'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 61.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11, 
THENCE SOUTH 01°58'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.09 FEETTO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY 
LINE OF BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HIGHWAY ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 11; 
THENCE NORTH 88°26'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 59.30 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 
LINE, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 11; THENCE NORTH 00°08'00" EAST, A DISTANCE 
OF 73.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING 
HAVING AN AREA OF 6,781 SQUARE FEET OR 0.16 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 
SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. 
BASIS OF BEARING: IS SOUTH 85°05'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 
ANTHONY HART D.L.C., 60, AS SHOWN ON MAP IN BOOK 8, PAGE 30 RECORDS OF PLATS, IN 
WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. 
EXHIBIT B 
ANNEXATION 2008-002 EXHIBIT MAP 
SITUATED IN LOT 11, BLOCK 1 OF "CLUB MEADOW" 
NW 1 / 4 , NE 1 / 4 SECTION 14, T.1S., R.1W., W.M., 
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
O R E G O N 
JULY 26.1906 
DAVID A. WINSBIP 
V 2165 
LOT 12 CLUB 
MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
SWCOR 
-ANTHONY HART 
D.L.C. 60 
P.O.C. 
WASHINGTON 
COUNTY 
P.O.B. 
^ ^ 0 0 X 465.50-
SW COR OF EX. 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
CITY OF BEA VERTON 
loj 
O Q 
cq 10 
NORTH 1/2 LOT 11 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
WASHINGTON 
COUNTY 
ki 
o o 
Qo 0 
NORTH 
11-40' 
: 
61.70 
0 O) 
SOUTH 1/2 LOT 11 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
§ LOT 11 
O Do 
IT) 
00 £ 6,781 S.F. 
0.16 ACRES 
/ 59.30' 
CLUB MEADOW 
SUBDIVISION 
WASHINGTON 
COUNTY 
Z N88'26 '00 "W 
S. IV BEA VERTON - HILLSDALE HWY 
Y:\$URV\martin\2008\annexations\Qnx2008-Q02\anx-2008-002.dwq SHEET 1 OF 1 
CENTEW^i 
City of Beaverton 
EXHIBIT M A P FOR 
A N N E X A T I O N 2 0 0 8 - 0 0 2 
L E G A L DESCRIPTION 
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 
ENGINEERING DIVISION 
JOB NO: 08-002 
DATE• 02.04.08 
DRAWN BY: MTS 
CHECKED BY-MTS 
APPROVED BY• 
REVISION 
REVISION. 
ATTACHMENT B 
Resolution No. 3785 
City of Beaverton Urban Service Area and Corporate Limits 
Annexation Policies 
A. City of Beaverton Urban Service Area Policy 
The City remains committed to annexing its urban services area over time, but the City 
will be selective regarding the methods of annexation it chooses to use. The City of 
Beaverton prefers to avoid use of annexation methods that may force annexation against 
the will of a majority of voters in larger unincorporated residential neighborhoods. The 
City is, however, open to annexation of these areas by other means where support for 
annexation is expressed, pursuant to a process specified by State law, by a majority of 
area voters and/or property owners. The City is open to pursuing infrastructure/service 
planning for the purposes of determining the current and future needs of such areas and 
how such areas might best fit into the City of Beaverton provided such unincorporated 
residents pursue an interest of annexing into the City. 
B. City of Beaverton Corporate Limits Policy 
The City of Beaverton is committed to annexing those unincorporated areas that 
generally exist inside the City's corporate limits. Most of these areas, known as "islands", 
generally receive either direct or indirect benefit from City services. The Washington 
County 2000 Policy, adopted in the mid-1980s, recognizes that the County should not be 
a long-term provider of municipal services and that urban unincorporated areas including 
unincorporated islands should eventually be annexed to cities. As such, primarily through 
the use of the 'island annexation method', the City's objectives in annexing such areas 
are to: 
• Minimize the confusion about the location of City boundaries for the provision of 
services; 
• Improve the efficiency of city service provision, particularly police patrols; 
• Control the development/redevelopment of properties that will eventually be within 
the City's boundaries; 
• Create complete neighborhoods and thereby eliminate small pockets of 
unincorporated land, and • Increase the City's tax base and minimize increasing the City's mill rate. 
In order to achieve these stated objectives, the City chooses to generally pursue the 
following areas for 'island annexation' into the City of Beaverton: 
• Undeveloped property zoned for industrial, commercial uses or mixed uses; 
• Developed or redevelopable property zoned for industrial, commercial or mixed uses; 
• Undeveloped or redevelopable property zoned for residential use; 
• Smaller developed property zoned residential (within a neighborhood that is largely 
incorporated within the City of Beaverton). 
21