Oregon Law Review : Vol. 91, No. 3 (2013)
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/13590
2024-03-29T09:41:45ZChallenging State and Local Anti-Immigrant Employment Laws: An Evaluation of Preemption, Equal Protection, and Judicial Awareness Tactics
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/13598
Challenging State and Local Anti-Immigrant Employment Laws: An Evaluation of Preemption, Equal Protection, and Judicial Awareness Tactics
Sitton, Emily
32 pages
2013-05-21T00:00:00ZWhen Justices (Subconsciously) Attack: The Theory of Argumentative Threat and the Supreme Court
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/13597
When Justices (Subconsciously) Attack: The Theory of Argumentative Threat and the Supreme Court
Long, Lance N.; Christensen, William F.
28 pages
2013-05-21T00:00:00ZMarijuana Lawyers: Outlaws or Crusaders?
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/13596
Marijuana Lawyers: Outlaws or Crusaders?
Kamin, Sam; Walk, Eli
64 pages
2013-05-21T00:00:00ZGone Too Far: Federal Regulation of Health Care Attorneys
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/13595
Gone Too Far: Federal Regulation of Health Care Attorneys
Tovino, Stacey A.
Outside health care counsel frequently obtain medical records, billing records, health insurance claims records, and other records containing individually identifiable health information in the course of representing health industry clients in medical malpractice, licensure, certification, accreditation, fraud and abuse, peer review, and other civil, criminal, and administrative health law matters. This Article is the first to argue that state rules of professional conduct, not federal health information confidentiality regulations, should govern outside health care counsel’s use and disclosure of confidential client information, and that outside counsel should be excepted from direct federal regulation under the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
56 pages
2013-05-21T00:00:00Z