Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTiefer, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T22:50:33Z
dc.date.available2010-10-14T22:50:33Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/10805
dc.description32 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis Article analyzes and builds upon the somewhat successful steps taken by the Department of Defense and the Department of State in 2008–2009 to manage the problem of the Blackwater incident at Nisour Square . Analyzing those steps shows a key strand consisting of what may be called the “contract law” approach. In the much-expanded form proposed in this Article, the “contract law” approach would use government contract requirements, contracting tools and sanctions, contract-related claims, and distinctive contract-related suits to both control and remedy private security abuses and injuries. This Article continues my prior studies as a professor of government contracting law with a specific interest in the Iraq war.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon Law Schoolen_US
dc.subjectNisour Square (Baghdad, Iraq)en_US
dc.subjectBlackwater Worldwideen_US
dc.subjectContract lawen_US
dc.subjectIraq War, 2003-2011en_US
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 88 No. 3, p.745-776 : No More Nisour Squares: Legal Control of Private Security Contractors in Iraq and Afteren_US
dc.title.alternativeNo More Nisour Squares: Legal Control of Private Security Contractors in Iraq and Afteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record