Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarmer, Susan Beth
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-02T18:01:34Z
dc.date.available2011-05-02T18:01:34Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citation89 Or. L. Rev. 885 (2011)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/11136
dc.description10 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractIam pleased to be here today to speak about an important issue in American antitrust law: immunities and exemptions that limit or preclude the application of antitrust laws to certain conduct or industries. The core message of my remarks today is that the changing dynamics of many industries coupled with the increasing analytical rigor that courts and antitrust enforcement agencies apply should alleviate the concerns that have been cited by advocates of exemptions. Free market competition is a fundamental and core principle of this country. As the bipartisan Antitrust Modernization Commission recognized, just as private constraints on competition can be harmful to consumer welfare, so can government restraints. Thus, the use of such restraints should be minimized.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.subjectAntitrust law
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 89, No. 3, p. 885-914 : Antitrust Immunitiesen_US
dc.title.alternativeAntitrust Immunitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record