Canon and corpus: The making of American poetry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Upton, Corbett Earl, 1970-
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-17T00:14:50Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-17T00:14:50Z
dc.date.issued 2010-12
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/11286
dc.description viii, 233 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation argues that certain iconic poems have shaped the canon of American poetry. Not merely "canonical" in the usual sense, iconic poems enjoy a special cultural sanction and influence; they have become discourses themselves, generating our notions about American poetry. By "iconic" I mean extraordinarily famous works like Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's "Paul Revere's Ride," Walt Whitman's "Song of Myself," and Claude McKay's "If We Must Die," that do not merely reside in the national memory but that have determined each poet's reception and thus have shaped the history of American poetry. Through case studies, I examine longstanding assumptions about these poets and the literary histories and myths surrounding their legendary texts. In carefully historicized readings of these and other iconic poems, I elucidate the pressure a single poem can exert on a poet's reputation and on American poetry broadly. I study the iconic poem in the context of the poet's corpus to demonstrate its role within the poet's oeuvre and the role assigned to it by canon makers. By tracing a poem's reception, I aim to identify the national, periodic, political, and formal boundaries these poems enforce and the distortions they create. Because iconic poems often direct and justify our inclusions and exclusions, they are of particular use in clarifying persistent obstacles to the canon reformation work of the last thirty years. While anthologies have become more inclusive in their selections and self-conscious about their ideological motives, many of the practices regarding individual poets and poems have remained unchanged over the last fifty years. Even as we include more poets in the canon, we often ironically do so by isolating a particular portion of the career, impulse in the work, or even a single poem, narrowing rather than expanding the horizon of our national literature. Through close readings situated in historical and cultural contexts, I illustrate the varying effects of iconic poems on the poet, other poems, and literary history. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Committee in charge: Dr. Karen J. Ford, Chair; Dr. John T. Gage, Member; Dr. Ernesto J. Martinez, Member; Dr. Leah W. Middlebrook, Outside Member en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher University of Oregon en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries University of Oregon theses, Dept. of English, Ph. D., 2010;
dc.subject Poetry en_US
dc.subject Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth, 1807-1882 en_US
dc.subject Whitman, Walt, 1819-1892 en_US
dc.subject Caribbean literature en_US
dc.subject McKay, Claude, 1890-1948 en_US
dc.subject Jamaica en_US
dc.subject African American studies en_US
dc.subject Black studies en_US
dc.subject American literature -- History and criticism en_US
dc.title Canon and corpus: The making of American poetry en_US
dc.title.alternative Making of American poetry en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Upton_Corbett_Earl_phd2010fa.pdf 3.242Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record