Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRubstello, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-06T01:09:58Z
dc.date.available2012-04-06T01:09:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citation90 Or. L. Rev. 855 (2012)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/12131
dc.description30 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractThis Comment begins by providing a general overview of privilege law. It discusses the differences between privilege and confidentiality, looks at how choice of law plays into privilege issues, outlines state and federal privilege, and shows what can happen when state and federal privileges come into conflict. Next, this Comment focuses on privilege in the context of mediation by contrasting mediation privilege with settlement protections, and it gives an overview of how various courts have looked at addressing questions of mediation privilege and confidentiality. This Comment concludes that, in order to provide claimants with predictability surrounding their mediation communications related to state claims ending up in federal court, federal courts should always treat state mediation communication protections as substantive law and apply state protections to state claims.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsrights_reserveden_US
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 855-884 : Predictable Protection for Mediated Pendent State Claims: A Judicial Solutionen_US
dc.title.alternativePredictable Protection for Mediated Pendent State Claims: A Judicial Solutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record