Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 855-884 : Predictable Protection for Mediated Pendent State Claims: A Judicial Solution

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rubstello, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-06T01:09:58Z
dc.date.available 2012-04-06T01:09:58Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation 90 Or. L. Rev. 855 (2012) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0196-2043
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12131
dc.description 30 pages en_US
dc.description.abstract This Comment begins by providing a general overview of privilege law. It discusses the differences between privilege and confidentiality, looks at how choice of law plays into privilege issues, outlines state and federal privilege, and shows what can happen when state and federal privileges come into conflict. Next, this Comment focuses on privilege in the context of mediation by contrasting mediation privilege with settlement protections, and it gives an overview of how various courts have looked at addressing questions of mediation privilege and confidentiality. This Comment concludes that, in order to provide claimants with predictability surrounding their mediation communications related to state claims ending up in federal court, federal courts should always treat state mediation communication protections as substantive law and apply state protections to state claims. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher University of Oregon School of Law en_US
dc.rights rights_reserved en_US
dc.title Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 855-884 : Predictable Protection for Mediated Pendent State Claims: A Judicial Solution en_US
dc.title.alternative Predictable Protection for Mediated Pendent State Claims: A Judicial Solution en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Rubstello.pdf 109.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record