Browsing Oregon Law Review : Vol. 91, No. 1 (2012) by Title

Navigation

Display Options

Results

  • Preston, Cheryl B.; McCann, Eli (University of Oregon School of Law, 2012)
    Part I of this article discusses the dangers of adhesion contracts, particularly in the online context, where they are most susceptible to abuse. In Part II, we discuss foundational contract principles, specifically the ...
  • Klein, Dora W. (University of Oregon School of Law, 2012)
    The cases discussed in this Article concern three general topics: the culpability of juvenile offenders; mental states and the criminal process, including the presentation of mental disorder evidence, competency to stand ...
  • Flaherty, Maura K. (University of Oregon School of Law, 2012)
    Part I provides an introduction to the L3C through a discussion of the form’s potential and “promises” in three contexts: tax and private foundation investment, other private investment, and the broader promise of a new ...
  • Van Wieren, Amanda (University of Oregon School of Law, 2012)
    Part I of this Comment describes the framework that the Supreme Court has supplied for deciding the applicability of state and federal rules in the contexts of Erie, preemption, and reverse-Erie. Part II explores the ...
  • Gevurtz, Franklin A. (University of Oregon School of Law, 2012)
    For years, scholars have debated why parties choose to incorporate under Delaware law companies that operate businesses in other states—since different answers to this question lead to different normative assessments of ...

Search Scholars' Bank


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics