dc.contributor.author |
Moseley, Cassandra |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Donoghue, Ellen M. (Ellen Mary) |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Charnley, Susan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
MacFarland, Kate |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-14T23:39:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-14T23:39:26Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19168 |
|
dc.description |
4 pages |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Congress granted broad stewardship contracting authority to the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land
Management in the FY 2003 appropriations act to help these agencies accomplish restoration and
hazardous fuels reduction and increase community benefit from these activities. During the first several
years of the authority, the use of stewardship contracting was uneven, with some national forests making
significant use of the authorities while others hardly used stewardship contracting at all. Although the stewardship
contracting has become more wide spread in recent years, it is not clear why some national forests
were early adopters and others were more hesitant to use the authorities. This study provides insight into the
question of why the use of stewardship contracting was initially so variable. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
This briefing paper was made possible with funding from the USDA Forest Service, National Fire Plan, Ford Foundation, and University of Oregon. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
EWP briefing paper;no. 32 |
|
dc.rights |
Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Forest management--Contracting out |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Fuel reduction (Wildfire prevention) |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public contracts |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
United States. Forest Service |
en_US |
dc.title |
Adopting stewardship contracting : lessons from four national forests |
en_US |
dc.type |
Other |
en_US |