dc.contributor.author |
Quirke, Douglas |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Moseley, Cassandra |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-03-07T18:41:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-03-07T18:41:46Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19737 |
|
dc.description |
12 pages |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The purpose of this paper is to examine similarities and differences between treatment of forest workers and small and disadvantaged businesses performing the same work in Oregon:
a.) under existing federal pathways for accomplishing forest restoration work, and;
b.) under the Good Neighbor Authority pathway, which allows for the use of state procurement law to accomplish work on federal land. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
This work was funded via an agreement with the Oregon Department of Forestry. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
EWP working paper;no. 63 |
|
dc.rights |
Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public lands |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public contracts |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Forest management--Contracting out |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Government contractors |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
United States. Forest Service |
en_US |
dc.title |
Good Neighbor Authority in Oregon : Comparison of state and federal contracting provisions |
en_US |
dc.type |
Working Paper |
en_US |