JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Scholars' Bank will
be on a content freeze from 9/6 - 9/16 as we transition to a new & improved version. Minimal downtime expected
on 9/16. Stay tuned for more updates!
Browsing Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015) by Title
Navigation
Display Options
Results
Now showing items 1-6 of 6
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)The law treats our companion animals, for most purposes, the same as other forms of chattel: a pair of shoes, a chair, a cell phone. But how can this be so? How can the law not discern between sentient beings and inanimate ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)Federal courts currently disagree about the scope of criminal liability under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (hereinafter “MBTA” or “Act”). The controversy involves the meaning of the word “take” and whether it applies to ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)Every fifteen minutes a poacher kills an elephant for its ivory. If this rate continues, the African elephant could become extinct in twenty years. Although federal law has strictly regulated the ivory market for several ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)On January 13, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) made history. The EPA issued its thirteenth veto in nearly half a century to shut down portions of the largest mountaintop removal mining project ever ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)Protecting riparian buffers is the best and most economical way to bar nonpoint source pollution from surface waters.
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09)The surge of hydraulic fracturing in the United States has spawned concern over public health risks associated with the practice. Some states, such as New York, have ultimately banned hydraulic fracturing citing significant ...
Now showing items 1-6 of 6