JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 95, No. 1 (2016)
Browse by
©University of Oregon School of Law, 1515 Agate St, Eugene, OR, 97403 Phone: (541) 346-3852
Recent Submissions
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)Book review: BASEBALL AND THE LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS. Louis H. Schiff and Robert M. Jarvis. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2016
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)Should college athletes receive more compensation because of the revenues they generate for their respective universities?
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)This Article argues that scholars and the courts were unaware of a fundamental element defining the social reality of contemporary copyright and aims to remedy this lack of awareness. It articulates an innovative approach ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)This Article is the first to investigate the scope of the delegation to pro se staff and to consider corresponding separation of powers concerns. Local procedure that delegates this deciding judicial power to pro se staff ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)The United States Sentencing Guidelines (the Guidelines) are used to calculate sentencing ranges for roughly 75,000 defendants each year. Despite that ubiquity, the law is unsettled on a very basic question: whether the ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2017-03-30)In 1934, Oregon amended its Constitution to allow, “that in the circuit court ten members of the jury may render a verdict of guilty or not guilty, save and except a verdict of guilty for first degree murder, which shall ...