Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanssen, Shelby
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-21T23:28:35Z
dc.date.available2017-12-21T23:28:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-21
dc.identifier.citation96 OR. L. REV. 283en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/22999
dc.description30 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractThis Note begins in Part I by discussing concepts of contemporary gender theory necessary to contextualize the Oregon nonbinary ruling. Part II offers a brief history of legal determinations of sex and gender in the United States. Part III provides a thorough explanation of the Oregon and California rulings authenticating nonbinary gender status, as well as pending federal litigation on a similar issue. Part IV explores four major approaches to gender documentation in the United States. Part V suggests two concrete steps for the modernization of gender documentation policies and practices.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.titleBeyond Male or Female: Using Nonbinary Gender Identity to Confront Outdated Notions of Sex and Gender in the Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record