Scholars' Bank will
be on a content freeze from 9/6 - 9/16 as we transition to a new & improved version. Minimal downtime expected
on 9/16. Stay tuned for more updates!
Browsing Oregon Law Review : Vol. 96, No. 2 (2018) by Issue Date
Navigation
Display Options
Results
-
Peck, Robert S. Peck; Chemerinsky, Erwin
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Jury trials and access to the courts more generally have sustained unwarranted decades-long attacks. Assaults on these fundamental cornerstones of our civil justice system have not just warped the views of the public and ...
-
Chung, John J.
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
This article addresses the issue of cybersecurity and threats to critical infrastructure from individuals, nation-states, and/or groups of individuals (working on behalf of or independently of nation-states).
-
Marmaduke, Susan
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
The Horton decision, its meaning, and its significance for statutes that eliminate causes of action or curtail the recoverable damages for various torts have been the subject of much debate and litigation. The Oregon Court ...
-
Dahab, Nadia
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
The point of this article is to examine how tort reform happened in Oregon.
-
Daniels, Stephen; Martin, Joanne
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
-
Schuman, David
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Horton vs. Oregon Health & Science University.
-
Eiva, Travis
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
This Article questions the Oregon Supreme Court’s analysis and, ultimately, its holding in Horton. Specifically, the Article reviews the history of the civil jury trial, leading up to its inclusion in the Oregon Constitution. ...
-
Hallman, W. Eugene
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
The cap on noneconomic damages of ORS 31.710(1) was declared unconstitutional in 1999 as a violation of the right to a jury trial under article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution. Lakin, in turn, was overruled by ...
-
Oregon Law Review 2017–18 Editorial Board
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
-
Peck, Robert S.; Durham, Christine; Wolff, Michael; Hannaford-Agor, Paula
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Transcript of a symposium panel discussion.
-
Clarke, Kathryn H.
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Why arrange a symposium in the wake of the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in Horton v. Oregon Health & Science University? To some of us, the answer may seem so obvious that the question borders on the inane, but the ...
-
Daniels, Stephen; Sharkey, Catherine; Miller, Dave; Welborn, Gordon
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Transcript of a symposium panel discussion.
-
Brescia, Raymond H.
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
For nearly as long as public law litigation1 has been a fixture of the political, social, economic, and jurisprudential landscape of the United States, some judges and interest groups have sought ways to scale it back. ...
-
Eiva, Travis; Marmaduke, Susan; Hallman, W. Eugene; Schuman, David
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Transcript of a symposium panel discussion.
-
Chemerinsky, Erwin
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2018-04-10)
Transcript of a symposium presentation.
Search Scholars' Bank
Browse
-
All of Scholars' Bank
-
This Collection
My Account
Statistics