“Do Not Resuscitate” Tattoos: Adequate Evidence of a Patient’s Intent to Die?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Elzweig, Brian

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Oregon School of Law

Abstract

In late 2017, paramedics brought an unconscious, unidentified, and unaccompanied seventy-year-old man to the Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, Florida. The man’s blood alcohol content was elevated, and he had a history of diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Upon the man’s chest was a tattoo that read “DO NOT RESUSCITATE.” The tattoo also included his signature. This left his doctors with a legal and ethical dilemma: Is a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) tattoo a valid advance directive?

Description

30 pages

Keywords

Advance directive, Ethics, Medical liability

Citation

97 OR. L. REV. 277

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By