“Do Not Resuscitate” Tattoos: Adequate Evidence of a Patient’s Intent to Die?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Elzweig, Brian
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Oregon School of Law
Abstract
In late 2017, paramedics brought an unconscious, unidentified, and unaccompanied seventy-year-old man to the Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, Florida. The man’s blood alcohol content was elevated, and he had a history of diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Upon the man’s chest was a tattoo that read “DO NOT RESUSCITATE.” The tattoo also included his signature. This left his doctors with a legal and ethical dilemma: Is a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) tattoo a valid advance directive?
Description
30 pages
Keywords
Advance directive, Ethics, Medical liability
Citation
97 OR. L. REV. 277