Oregon Law Review : Vol. 80, No. 4 (Winter 2001)

Bothello, Deena B. 2007-07-31T18:59:18Z 2007-07-31T18:59:18Z 2001 80 Or. L. Rev. 1469 (2001) 0196-2043 http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4608 18 p. 77703 bytes application/pdf en_US University of Oregon School of Law Oregon Law Review : Vol. 80, No. 4, p. 1469-1486 : An Unequal Balance: Repudiation and Restitution in Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United States An Unequal Balance: Repudiation and Restitution in Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United States Repudiation and Restitution in Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United States Article

Arnow-Richman, Rachel S. 2007-07-31T18:58:33Z 2007-07-31T18:58:33Z 2001 80 Or. L. Rev. 1163 (2001) 0196-2043 http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4604 82 p. 884966 bytes application/pdf en_US University of Oregon School of Law Noncompete agreements Covenants not to compete Oregon Law Review : Vol. 80, No. 4, p. 1163-1244 : Bargaining for Loyalty in the Information Age: A Reconsideration of the Role of Substantive Fairness in Enforcing Employee Noncompetes Bargaining for Loyalty in the Information Age: A Reconsideration of the Role of Substantive Fairness in Enforcing Employee Noncompetes A Reconsideration of the Role of Substantive Fairness in Enforcing Employee Noncompetes Article

Fisher, Keith R. 2007-07-31T19:05:34Z 2007-07-31T19:05:34Z 2001 80 Or. L. Rev. 1301 (2001) 0196-2043 http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4639 122 p. 488350 bytes application/pdf en_US University of Oregon School of Law United States. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Oregon Law Review : Vol. 80, No. 4, p. 1301-1422 : Orphan of Invention: Why the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Was Unnecessary Orphan of Invention: Why the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Was Unnecessary Why the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Was Unnecessary Article