dc.contributor.author |
Goldberg, Suzanne B. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
LatCrit Conference (7th : 2002 : Portland, Or.) |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-07-31T19:00:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-07-31T19:00:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
81 Or. L. Rev. 629 (2002) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4615 |
|
dc.description |
34 p. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
161820 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Sexual orientation |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3, p. 629-662 : On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |