Oregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3, p. 629-662 : On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Goldberg, Suzanne B.
dc.contributor.author LatCrit Conference (7th : 2002 : Portland, Or.)
dc.date.accessioned 2007-07-31T19:00:29Z
dc.date.available 2007-07-31T19:00:29Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.citation 81 Or. L. Rev. 629 (2002) en
dc.identifier.issn 0196-2043
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4615
dc.description 34 p. en
dc.format.extent 161820 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher University of Oregon School of Law en
dc.subject Sexual orientation
dc.title Oregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3, p. 629-662 : On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court en
dc.title.alternative On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
81_Or_L_Rev_629.pdf 158.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record