dc.contributor.author |
Bagnall, George James, V |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-07-31T19:03:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-07-31T19:03:12Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
83 Or. L. Rev. 763 (2004) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4625 |
|
dc.description |
32 p. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
122959 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en |
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 763-794 : Notes of the 1991 Advisory Committee for the Amendment of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45: Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking? |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
Notes of the 1991 Advisory Committee for the Amendment of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45: Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking? |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
Is the Compulsion to Testify of an Unretained Expert Witness a Taking? |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |