Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Victor E.
dc.contributor.authorBehrens, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorTedesco, Rochelle M.
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.available2007-08-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citation82 Or. L. Rev. 33 (2003)en
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/4775
dc.description42 p.en
dc.format.extent159554 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen
dc.subjectExemplary damages
dc.subjectPunitive damages
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 033-074 : Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Lawen
dc.title.alternativeSelective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Lawen
dc.title.alternativeThe United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Lawen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record