Oregon Law Review : Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 033-074 : Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schwartz, Victor E.
dc.contributor.author Behrens, Mark A.
dc.contributor.author Tedesco, Rochelle M.
dc.date.accessioned 2007-08-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.available 2007-08-08T17:40:25Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation 82 Or. L. Rev. 33 (2003) en
dc.identifier.issn 0196-2043
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4775
dc.description 42 p. en
dc.format.extent 159554 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher University of Oregon School of Law en
dc.subject Exemplary damages
dc.subject Punitive damages
dc.title Oregon Law Review : Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 033-074 : Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law en
dc.title.alternative Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law en
dc.title.alternative The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ORE102.pdf 155.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record