dc.contributor.author |
Schwartz, Victor E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Behrens, Mark A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tedesco, Rochelle M. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-08-08T17:40:25Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-08-08T17:40:25Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2003 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
82 Or. L. Rev. 33 (2003) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4775 |
|
dc.description |
42 p. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
159554 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Exemplary damages |
|
dc.subject |
Punitive damages |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 033-074 : Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |