• Research Support
      • Starting Library Research
      • Research Guides
      • Subject Librarians
      • Digital Scholarship Center
      • Publishing & Copyright
      • Research Data Management
      • Study Skills & Campus Resources
      • Request a Purchase
    • Using the Libraries
      • Rooms & Study Spaces
      • Borrowing & Requesting
      • Connect from Off-campus
      • ILL (Interlibrary Loan)
      • Course Reserves
      • Technology, Printing, & Scanning
      • Tutoring at the UO Libraries
      • Classroom Technology Support
      • Canvas Support
      • Accessibility
    • Collections
      • Databases A-Z
      • Scholars' Bank
      • Videos, Music, Photos
      • Special Collections & University Archives
      • Unique Collections
      • Government Documents
      • Maps & Aerial Photography
      • Oregon Digital
      • Oregon Newspapers
    • Library Accounts
      • LibrarySearch Account
      • ILLiad Account (Interlibrary Loan)
      • Endnote Web (Citation Manager)
    • About
      • Hours & Locations
      • Staff & Department Directory
      • News & Events
      • Calendar
      • Mission, Values, & Strategic Directions
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Policies
      • Jobs
      • Comments & Suggestions
    • Chat/Ask Us
      • Email
      • Phone
      • Text
    View Item 
    •   Scholars' Bank Home
    • Scholarly Works
    • UO Scholarly Publications
    • Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation
    • Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 2006)
    • View Item
    •   Scholars' Bank Home
    • Scholarly Works
    • UO Scholarly Publications
    • Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation
    • Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 2006)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 259-316 : The Oregon and California Lands Act: Revisting the Concept of Dominant Use

    View/Open
    OEL201.pdf (229.9Kb)

    Date
    2006
    Author
    Scott, Deborah
    Brown, Susan Jane M.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Author
    Scott, Deborah
    Brown, Susan Jane M.
    Abstract
    Part I of this Article is a history of the O&C lands, and Part II describes the Act’s legislative history, provisions, regulations, and amendments. Part III summarizes the various official interpretations of the O&C Act, including DOI Opinions, federal case law, and administrative appeals board decisions. Part IV argues that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Headwaters v. Bureau of Land Management, Medford District was wrongly decided, and that a fair reading of the case law and legislative history prompts a different conclusion than that drawn by the appellate court. Finally, Part V highlights a prescient opportunity for the public and the courts to reexamine the conventional wisdom that the O&C Act is a “dominant use” statute.
    URI


    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 2006) [5]

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of Scholars' BankCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    CAMPUS

    • News
    • Events
    • Maps
    • Directions
    • Class Schedule
    • Academic Calendar

    RESOURCES

    • Webmail
    • Canvas
    • Duckweb
    • Find People
    • A–Z Index
    • UO Libraries

    RELATED INFORMATION

    • Library Accessibility
    • Privacy Policy
    • Giving
    UO Libraries
    1501 Kincaid Street
    1239 University of Oregon
    Eugene, OR 97403-1299

    T: 541-346-3053

    FacebookTwitterYouTubeInstagram

    CareersPrivacy PolicyAboutFind People
    University of Oregon
    ©University of Oregon. All Rights Reserved.

    UO prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national or ethnic origin, age, religion, marital status, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression in all programs, activities and employment practices as required by Title IX, other applicable laws, and policies. Retaliation is prohibited by UO policy. Questions may be referred to the Title IX Coordinator, Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity, or to the Office for Civil Rights. Contact information, related policies, and complaint procedures are listed on the statement of non-discrimination.