dc.contributor.author |
Yoon, Nayoung |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2008-09-30T17:24:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2008-09-30T17:24:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-06 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/7361 |
|
dc.description |
78 p. Examining committee chair: Lori Hager |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Increasingly, funders require that community arts organizations demonstrate evidence of program outcomes on participants and local communities. However, little information exists concerning outcome-based evaluation methods for community arts projects. In this study, a comparative analysis is presented of three arts program evaluation models used in Australia, Northern Ireland, and the United States. To frame the context of the study, a review of literature addresses trends in the field of program evaluation and types of program evaluation--specifically, outcome-based evaluation as applied to the arts and to country-specific evaluations. Findings of the study are presented as a synthesis of comparative analysis with the literature review. The study concludes with a discussion of findings and recommendations for each arts program evaluation model. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
476112 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
University of Oregon project, Arts and Administration Program, M.S. 2008 |
en |
dc.subject |
Arts program evaluation model |
en |
dc.subject |
Community arts |
en |
dc.subject |
Outcome-based evaluation |
en |
dc.subject |
Program evaluation |
en |
dc.title |
Evaluation of Community Arts Projects: Comparison among Three Program Evaluation Models |
en |
dc.type |
Other |
en |