• Research Support
      • Starting Library Research
      • Research Guides
      • Subject Librarians
      • Digital Scholarship Center
      • Publishing & Copyright
      • Research Data Management
      • Study Skills & Campus Resources
      • Request a Purchase
    • Using the Libraries
      • Rooms & Study Spaces
      • Borrowing & Requesting
      • Connect from Off-campus
      • ILL (Interlibrary Loan)
      • Course Reserves
      • Technology, Printing, & Scanning
      • Tutoring at the UO Libraries
      • Classroom Technology Support
      • Canvas Support
      • Accessibility
    • Collections
      • Databases A-Z
      • Scholars' Bank
      • Videos, Music, Photos
      • Special Collections & University Archives
      • Unique Collections
      • Government Documents
      • Maps & Aerial Photography
      • Oregon Digital
      • Oregon Newspapers
    • Library Accounts
      • LibrarySearch Account
      • ILLiad Account (Interlibrary Loan)
      • Endnote Web (Citation Manager)
    • About
      • Hours & Locations
      • Staff & Department Directory
      • News & Events
      • Calendar
      • Mission, Values, & Strategic Directions
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Policies
      • Jobs
      • Comments & Suggestions
    • Chat/Ask Us
      • Email
      • Phone
      • Text
    View Item 
    •   Scholars' Bank Home
    • University Archives
    • University of Oregon Administration
    • The Office of Research, Innovation and Graduate Education
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Scholars' Bank Home
    • University Archives
    • University of Oregon Administration
    • The Office of Research, Innovation and Graduate Education
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Flexible behavior under control? Neural and behavioral evidence in favor of a two-component model of task-switching

    View/Open
    thesis (2.227Mb)

    Date
    2008-03
    Author
    Bryck, Richard Lee, 1978-
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Author
    Bryck, Richard Lee, 1978-
    Abstract
    The ability to rapidly change from one course of action to another, i.e. "flexible behavior", is a hallmark of human cognition. Laboratory observations of switch costs, an increase in reaction time and errors when alternating between tasks compared to repeating a task, have been argued to be a measure of endogenous control during flexible behavior. However, alternative models suggest no such reconfiguration processes are necessary to account for performance in these task-switching situations. The first part of this dissertation uses neuroimaging to address whether reconfiguration processes do in fact occur in the explicit cuing variant of the task-switching paradigm. Using a 4:2 mapping between cues and tasks, we found neuroanatomical evidence for a dissociation between cue-switch (left prefrontal and lateral parietal) and task-switch (medial precuneus and cerebellar) related areas, consistent with the claim of endogenous control during task selection. The second portion explores whether automatic, long-term memory (LTM) processes can explain the "switch cost asymmetry", the fact that switch costs are larger when switching into a dominant task rather than into a competing non-dominant task. We modified an alternating runs task-switching paradigm to include either long or short response-to-stimulus intervals (RSIs) after each pair of trials (i.e., AA-AA-BB-BB), thereby inducing selection costs not only at the point of a task-switch (i.e., AA-BB), but also between same-task pairs (i.e., AA-AA). Using spatially compatible versus incompatible response rules and Stroop word versus color naming, we found asymmetric effects not only at task-change transitions, but also at task-repeat transitions when the RSI was long (presumably inducing frequent losses of task set). In two additional experiments, an asymmetry for long RSIs was obtained even when competing tasks were separated into alternating single task blocks, but not when the tasks were compared in a between-subject design. This pattern supports the idea that the asymmetry arises from interference effects occurring in LTM traces. The combined results of this dissertation characterize task-switching processes not as an "either-or" phenomenon in regards to the question of control, but rather as the interplay between top-down, executive functions and bottom-up, long-term memory priming mechanisms.
    URI


    Collections
    • Psychology Theses and Dissertations [111]
    • Theses and Dissertations [2826]

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of Scholars' BankCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    CAMPUS

    • News
    • Events
    • Maps
    • Directions
    • Class Schedule
    • Academic Calendar

    RESOURCES

    • Webmail
    • Canvas
    • Duckweb
    • Find People
    • A–Z Index
    • UO Libraries

    RELATED INFORMATION

    • Library Accessibility
    • Privacy Policy
    • Giving
    UO Libraries
    1501 Kincaid Street
    1239 University of Oregon
    Eugene, OR 97403-1299

    T: 541-346-3053

    FacebookTwitterYouTubeInstagram

    CareersPrivacy PolicyAboutFind People
    University of Oregon
    ©University of Oregon. All Rights Reserved.

    UO prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national or ethnic origin, age, religion, marital status, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression in all programs, activities and employment practices as required by Title IX, other applicable laws, and policies. Retaliation is prohibited by UO policy. Questions may be referred to the Title IX Coordinator, Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity, or to the Office for Civil Rights. Contact information, related policies, and complaint procedures are listed on the statement of non-discrimination.