JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 87, No. 2 (2008)
Browse by
Recent Submissions
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)This Article will examine three hypothetical situations involving health care decision making. The issue in each will be how to make a medical decision when the patient does not refuse treatment but may lack decision-making ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)The conventional wisdom among practitioners and legal ethics scholars has been that lawyers may ethically negotiate any settlement terms that serve their clients’ interests and are not criminal or fraudulent. (Some ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)We begin in Part I by describing and modeling how merchants and consumers decide whether to adopt and use a particular payment technology and then introduce the complications of network effects and multi-sided platforms. ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)Part I of this Comment summarizes the history of punitive damages jurisprudence leading up to the conflict in Philip Morris. Part II discusses the factual and procedural history of Philip Morris and explains the Supreme ...
-
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2008)Part I of this Comment summarizes the arguments for and against secrecy in settlements, and the particular benefits of secrecy in medical cases. Part II provides an overview of the Dalkon Shield cases and focuses primarily ...