Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 23, No. 2, p. 451-490 : Representing Nonconcurrent Generations: The Problem of Now

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Olmsted, James L.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-19T17:25:15Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-19T17:25:15Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.citation 23 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 451 (2008) en
dc.identifier.issn 1049-0280
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/9189
dc.description A print copy of this title is available through the UO Libraries under the call number: LAW LIB. K 10 .O425 en
dc.description.abstract This Article first provides a brief discussion of the historical and philosophical antecedents of real property law in the United States. The Article next provides an historical and legal analysis explaining how conservation easements fit within the current real property regime in the United States. Having thus laid this contextual groundwork, the Article expounds upon the merits of perpetual conservation easements. The final parts of the Article are in rebuttal to challenges to this Article in Professor Mahoney's article, Land Preservation and Institutional Design. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher University of Oregon School of Law en
dc.subject Land conservation en
dc.subject Conservation servitude en
dc.subject Conservation easement en
dc.subject Natural areas en
dc.title Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 23, No. 2, p. 451-490 : Representing Nonconcurrent Generations: The Problem of Now en
dc.title.alternative Representing Nonconcurrent Generations: The Problem of Now en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Olmsted.pdf 176.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record