dc.contributor.author |
Diller, Paul, A. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-09-17T16:17:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-09-17T16:17:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/9754 |
|
dc.description |
40 p. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This Article discusses some of the strengths and weaknesses of
Oregon’s home-rule system. It posits that a particular advantage of
Oregon’s home-rule system is its unique “reverse assumptions” of
validity for local civil and criminal enactments. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Home rule -- Oregon |
|
dc.subject |
Oregon -- Politics and government |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 87 No. 3, p.939-978 : The Partly Fulfilled Promise of Home Rule in Oregon |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
The Partly Fulfilled Promise of Home Rule in Oregon |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |