Oregon Review of International Law : Volume 14, Number 2 (2012)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Oregon Review of International Law : Volume 14, Number 2 (2012) by Most Recent
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access We’re Here, We’re Queer, Get Used to It: Freedom of Assembly and Gay Pride in Alekseyev v. Russia(University of Oregon School of Law, 2013-02-26) Thomas, Kristen L.Item Open Access Representation for the Accused: Haiti’s Thirst and a Role for Clinical Legal Education(University of Oregon School of Law, 2013-02-26) Bloch, Kate E.Item Open Access International Law as “Intimate Enemy”(University of Oregon School of Law, 2013-02-26) Singh, PrabhakarThe metaphor “intimate enemy” best captures the changing nature of international law vis-à-vis nations. “Intimate enemy” is a useful heuristic device that could be deployed to capture legal concepts of indeterminacy, dialectics, and reformulation within international law.Item Open Access Power, Pragmatism, and Prisoner Abuse: Amnesty and Accountability in the United States(University of Oregon School of Law, 2013-02-26) Mallinder, LouiseItem Open Access Who’s the Fascist? Uses of the Nazi Past at the Geert Wilders Trial(University of Oregon School of Law, 2013-02-26) Kahn, Robert A.European hate speech laws rest in part on the idea that Europe’s past—in particular its Nazi past—creates a special situation, one that justifies restrictions on speech that would otherwise be incompatible with a liberal democracy. While this trend is most evident in laws that relate directly to the Nazi past (such as those banning denial or trivialization of the Holocaust) the issue is broader.