Department of Philosophy

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/1794/1177

Browse

Browsing Department of Philosophy by Subject "assisted reproductive technology"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Bioethicists Should be Helping Scientists Think About Race
    (Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2021) Russell, Camisha
    In this essay, I argue that bioethicists have a thus-far unfulfilled role to play in helping life scientists, including medical doctors and researchers, think about race. I begin with descriptions of how life scientists tend to think about race and descriptions of typical approaches to bioethics. I then describe three different approaches to race: biological race, race as social construction, and race as cultural driver of history. Taking into account the historical and contemporary interplay of these three approaches, I suggest an alternative framework for thinking about race focused on how the idea of race functions socially. Finally, using assisted reproductive technologies as an example, I discuss how bioethicists and scientists might work together using this framework to improve not only their own but broader perspectives on race.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The Race Idea in Reproductive Technologies: Beyond Epistemic Scientism and Technological Mastery
    (Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2015) Russell, Camisha
    This paper explores the limitations of epistemic scientism for understanding the role the concept of race plays in assisted reproductive technology (ART) practices. Two major limitations center around the desire to use scientific knowledge to bring about social improvement. In the first case, undue focus is placed on debunking the scientific reality of racial categories and characteristics. The alternative to this approach is to focus instead on the way the race idea functions in ART practices. Doing so reveals how the race idea (1) helps to define the reproductive “problems” different groups of women are experiencing and to dictate when and how they should be “helped”; (2) helps to resolve tensions about who should be considered the real parents of children produced by ARTs; and (3) is used to limit ART use where that use threatens to denaturalize the very sociopolitical landscape the race idea has created. In the second case, scientific knowledge regarding reproduction is thought to call for technological control over that reproduction. This leads to an overemphasis on personal responsibility and a depoliticization of racialized social inequalities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Response to Feder and Mills
    (Philosophy Today, 2020) Russell, Camisha
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Which Lives Matter in Reproductive Biomedicine?
    (Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 2021)
    The most recent Black Lives Matter moment provides an important opportunity for consideration of the interlocking social and political systems that contribute to ongoing racism and racial inequality. What does this mean in the context of reproductive biomedicine? Which lives do reproductive biomedicine devalue and how? In this commentary, I address why reproductive biomedicine is an important site for reflection on race, and how the Reproductive Justice Movement calls on us to shift our thinking. I argue for the need to recognize the deep connections between reproductive biomedicine and eugenics, and then offer some examples of racialization in reproductive biomedicine through assisted reproductive technology. Finally, I consider what steps practitioners might take to be part of the change for which this Black Lives Matter moment calls.