Land of the Free, Home of the (Un)Regulated: A Look at Market-Building and Liberalization in the EU and the US
| dc.contributor.author | Hoffmann, Leif, 1975- | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-20T17:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-20T17:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-09 | |
| dc.description | xv, 372 p. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In my dissertation I argue that because the European Union and the United States of America have been largely treated as unique or at least special cases, both the literature on American-state building and that on European market integration have missed how close comparison alters both our descriptive views and social-scientific explanations of the shape of each polity. In particular, scholars have not sufficiently recognized that the European Union has gone further than the United States in many elements of the creation of a centralized, liberalized single market, nor have they produced explanations that account well for this development. This study challenges the dominant assumption that the United States is generally more hierarchical and centralized than the European Union and more of a single free market in the sense of fewer allowable trade barriers. By analyzing the rules of market integration in services (over 70% of GDP), public procurement (15 - 20% GDP) and the regulated goods markets (goods like elevators with their own regulatory regimes), I demonstrate that in all these major cases the European Union has adopted rules that open exchange to competition more than the United States. While the actual integration of flows on the ground is still generally less across European states than American ones, the political rules are more - and more liberally - integrated in Europe. I offer an institutional and ideational argument to explain these differences, with two main parts. First, there is no American parallel to the institution of the European Commission, which is mandated to continually push liberalization forward. My research shows that Commission leadership has been critical to each of the examined cases. Second, broader norms of legitimate governance favor centralized authority - including liberalizing central authority - more in the European Union than in the United States. Despite all the criticism we hear of the European Union, the basic notion of federal governance of market integration is far more strongly accepted across Europe at both elite and mass levels than in the United States. As interview evidence in this study displays, many Americans consistently object to any role for the federal government. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Committee in charge: Dr. Craig Parsons, Chairperson; Dr. Gerald Berk, Member; Dr. Lars Skålnes, Member; Dr. Alexander B. Murphy, Outside Member | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/12026 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | University of Oregon theses, Dept. of Political Science, Ph. D., 2011; | |
| dc.rights | rights_reserved | en_US |
| dc.subject | Plate Tectonics | en_US |
| dc.subject | European studies | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject | Earth sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject | European Union | en_US |
| dc.subject | Federalism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Free market | en_US |
| dc.subject | Integration theories | en_US |
| dc.subject | Protectionism | en_US |
| dc.subject | United States | en_US |
| dc.title | Land of the Free, Home of the (Un)Regulated: A Look at Market-Building and Liberalization in the EU and the US | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |