The Foreign Policies of Revolutionary Leaders: Identity, Emotion, and Conflict Initiation

dc.contributor.advisorVu, Tuong
dc.contributor.authorVan Orden, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-11T22:27:53Z
dc.date.available2019-01-11T22:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-11
dc.description.abstractThis manuscript addresses an important empirical regularity: Why are revolutionary leaders more likely to initiate conflict? With the goal of explaining this regularity, I offer an identity-driven model of decision making that can explain why certain leaders are more likely to take risky gambles. Broadly, this manuscript provides a different model of decision making that emphasizes emotion and identity as key to explain decision making. I offer a plausibility probe of the identity-driven model with four in-depth case studies: The initiation of the Iran-Iraq War, the initiation of the Gulf War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the start of the Korean War. I use the congruence method and process tracing to test the plausibility probe. I find strong support in two cases—the initiation of the Iran-Iraq War and the Gulf War—and mixed support for the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Korean War.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/24192
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY 4.0-US
dc.subjectEmotionen_US
dc.subjectIdentityen_US
dc.subjectWaren_US
dc.titleThe Foreign Policies of Revolutionary Leaders: Identity, Emotion, and Conflict Initiation
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartment of Political Science
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Oregon
thesis.degree.leveldoctoral
thesis.degree.namePh.D.

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanOrden_oregon_0171A_12301.pdf
Size:
1.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format