Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications

dc.contributor.authorSlovic, Paul
dc.contributor.authorFischhoff, Baruch
dc.contributor.authorLichtenstein, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T22:40:00Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T22:40:00Z
dc.date.issued1981
dc.description32 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractSubjective judgments, whether by experts or lay people, are a major component in any risk assessment. If such judgments are faulty, risk management efforts are likely to be misdirected. This paper begins with an analysis of biases exhibited by lay people and experts when they make judgments about risk. Next the similarities and differences between lay and expert evaluations are examined in the context of a specific set of hazardous activities and technologies. Finally, insights from this research are applied to the problems of informing people about risk and forecasting public response towards nuclear power.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSlovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. In F. Warner & D. H. Slater (Eds.), The assessment and perception of risk (pp. 17-34). London: The Royal Society.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/22317
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectRisk analysisen_US
dc.subjectJudgmenten_US
dc.subjectNuclear poweren_US
dc.titlePerceived risk: Psychological factors and social implicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
slovic_142.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.23 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: