Reading Mastery and Learning Disabled Students: A Comment on the What Works Clearinghouse Review

dc.contributor.authorStockard, Jean
dc.contributor.authorWood, Timothy W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T19:28:12Z
dc.date.available2023-04-12T19:28:12Z
dc.date.issued2012-07
dc.description32 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractA recent report by the What Works Clearinghouse (2012) examined two studies of the use of Reading Mastery with learning disabled students and concluded that it had “no discernible effects on reading comprehension and potentially negative effects on alphabetics, reading fluency, and writing.” This conclusion is in stark contrast to dozens of studies of Reading Mastery and other elements of the Direct Instruction (DI) corpus of material. This research has consistently found strong positive effects of the programs on academic achievement for students of all ability levels.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/28189
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Institute for Direct Instruction (NIFDI)en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectLiterature Reviewen_US
dc.subjectDirect Instruction (DI)en_US
dc.titleReading Mastery and Learning Disabled Students: A Comment on the What Works Clearinghouse Reviewen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
stockard_jean_id171.pdf
Size:
189.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections