Expressiveness Reevaluated

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Miriam M.
dc.contributor.authorStockard, Jean
dc.contributor.authorAcker, Joan
dc.contributor.authorNaffziger, Claudeen
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T20:14:58Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T20:14:58Z
dc.date.issued1975-08
dc.description28 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractWhether one envisions a socially androgynous world as an eminent disaster or a desirable long-term goal, it is clear that men and women do differ and have always differed cross-culturally and historically in their roles, attitudes, motivation, and self-conceptions. But social scientists who try to define and measure sex differences are beset with problems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, M. M., Stockard, J., Acker, J., & Naffziger C. (1975). Expressiveness Reevaluated. School Review, 83, 617—644. https://doi.org/10.1086/443218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/28201
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectgender rolesen_US
dc.subjectsexen_US
dc.subjectfemininityen_US
dc.subjectmasculinityen_US
dc.titleExpressiveness Reevaluateden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
stockard_jean_id44.pdf
Size:
909.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections