Expressiveness Reevaluated
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Miriam M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stockard, Jean | |
| dc.contributor.author | Acker, Joan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naffziger, Claudeen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-19T20:14:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-19T20:14:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1975-08 | |
| dc.description | 28 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Whether one envisions a socially androgynous world as an eminent disaster or a desirable long-term goal, it is clear that men and women do differ and have always differed cross-culturally and historically in their roles, attitudes, motivation, and self-conceptions. But social scientists who try to define and measure sex differences are beset with problems. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, M. M., Stockard, J., Acker, J., & Naffziger C. (1975). Expressiveness Reevaluated. School Review, 83, 617—644. https://doi.org/10.1086/443218 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/28201 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Academic Press | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
| dc.subject | gender roles | en_US |
| dc.subject | sex | en_US |
| dc.subject | femininity | en_US |
| dc.subject | masculinity | en_US |
| dc.title | Expressiveness Reevaluated | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |