Judged frequency of lethal events

dc.contributor.authorSlovic, Paul
dc.contributor.authorLichtenstein, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorFischhoff, Baruch
dc.contributor.authorLayman, Mark
dc.contributor.authorCombs, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-03T17:50:56Z
dc.date.available2017-08-03T17:50:56Z
dc.date.issued1978
dc.descriptionPage 28en_US
dc.description.abstractA series of experiments studied how people judge the frequency of death from various causes. The judgments exhibited a highly consistent but systematically biased subjective scale of frequency. Two kinds of bias were identified: (a) a tendency to overestimate small frequencies and underestimate larger ones, and (b) a tendency to exaggerate the frequency of some specific causes and to underestimate the frequency of others, at any given level of objective frequency. These biases were traced to a number of possible sources, including disproportionate exposure, memorability, or imaginability of various events. Subjects were unable to correct for these sources of bias when specifically instructed to avoid them. Comparisons with precious laboratory studies are discussed, along with methods for improving frequency judgments and the implications of the present findings for the management of societal hazards.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/22549
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectEstimation (Mathematics)en_US
dc.titleJudged frequency of lethal eventsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Slovic_089.pdf
Size:
2.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.23 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: