Judged frequency of lethal events
dc.contributor.author | Slovic, Paul | |
dc.contributor.author | Lichtenstein, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Fischhoff, Baruch | |
dc.contributor.author | Layman, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Combs, Barbara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-03T17:50:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-03T17:50:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1978 | |
dc.description | Page 28 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A series of experiments studied how people judge the frequency of death from various causes. The judgments exhibited a highly consistent but systematically biased subjective scale of frequency. Two kinds of bias were identified: (a) a tendency to overestimate small frequencies and underestimate larger ones, and (b) a tendency to exaggerate the frequency of some specific causes and to underestimate the frequency of others, at any given level of objective frequency. These biases were traced to a number of possible sources, including disproportionate exposure, memorability, or imaginability of various events. Subjects were unable to correct for these sources of bias when specifically instructed to avoid them. Comparisons with precious laboratory studies are discussed, along with methods for improving frequency judgments and the implications of the present findings for the management of societal hazards. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/22549 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
dc.subject | Estimation (Mathematics) | en_US |
dc.title | Judged frequency of lethal events | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |