Cultural Evaluations of Risk: "Values" or "Blunders"?
Loading...
Files
Date
2006
Authors
Kahan, Dan
Slovic, Paul
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Harvard Law School
Abstract
What are the respective contributions of culture and rationality to
risk perception? Do disagreements between lay persons and experts
(and among members of both groups) originate in conflicting values,
differing abilities to comprehend technical information, or both? If
conflicting values do play a role, should the law be responsive to popular
perceptions of risk even when expert regulators believe that popular
beliefs are w1'ong?
These are the central questions in the debate between Professor
Sunstein and us. We take the position that cultural worldviews pervade
popular (not to mention expert) risk assessments and that a genuine
commitment to democracy forbids simply dismissing such perceptions
as products of ''bounded rationality. "1 Sunstein disagrees.1
The critical impo1t of Sunstein 's arguments notwithstanding, we
are grateful for his thoughtful reply to our review essay. We now respond
to two of Sunstein 's criticisms, one methodological and the other
substantive.
Description
7 pages
Keywords
Risk perception, Affect, Law
Citation
Kahan, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2006). Cultural evaluations of risk: “Values” or “blunders”? Harvard Law Review, 119, 166–172.