A Critique of the Different Methods of Handling the National Debt
dc.contributor.author | Cordiner, Jane | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-02T21:28:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-02T21:28:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1950-07 | |
dc.description | 67 pages | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The total direct and guaranteed debt of the United States government stands at $256 billion. This large national liability poses problems to which the public expects its elected officials to find adequate answers. Will huge national debt affect adversely the financing of another emergency? Should we increase it to maintain an economy of abundance and full employment? Can we use it as an instrument to regulate and manage the oscillations of the business cycle? If we choose to use it as a tools for regulating prices or employment or both what methods of manipulation would be desirable? These questions are not easily answered by any thoughtful person. Most of the recommendations concerning debt management fall under three general headings. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/28240 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
dc.subject | economics | en_US |
dc.subject | orthodox school | en_US |
dc.subject | full employment school | en_US |
dc.subject | price-stabalizing school | en_US |
dc.title | A Critique of the Different Methods of Handling the National Debt | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis / Dissertation | en_US |