The Irrelevance of Data to the Ethics of Intersex Surgery

dc.contributor.authorReis, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorReis-Dennis, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T21:12:03Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T21:12:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description3 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article we argue that early infant genital surgery violates children’s rights against the irreversible physical shaping of their sexual and reproductive identity. In making this case, we reject what has been the guiding assumption of the debate over early surgery, namely that the welfare of the child patient is paramount. One result of this assumption has been an interest in data that would support or refute claims about the relationship between early surgery and child welfare. Our argument, which emphasizes children’s rights, is that such data are irrelevant to the ethics of these surgical interventions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationE. Reis, S. Reis-Dennis (2021). The Irrelevance of Data to the Ethics of Intersex Surgery. Journal of Pediatric Ethics, 1(4), 162-164.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/26931
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChildren's Minnesota Clinical Ethics Programen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectIntersex surgeryen_US
dc.subjectchild welfareen_US
dc.subjectDSDen_US
dc.subjectearly surgeryen_US
dc.titleThe Irrelevance of Data to the Ethics of Intersex Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Reis_and_Reis_Dennis_JPE.pdf
Size:
114.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: