The influence of identifiability and singularity in moral decision making
| dc.contributor.author | Wiss, Johanna | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anderson, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Slovic, Paul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vastfjall, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tinghog, Gustav | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-19T20:41:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-19T20:41:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
| dc.description | 11 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | There is an increased willingness to help identified individuals rather than non-identified, and the effect of identifiability is mainly present when a single individual rather than a group is presented. However, identifiability and singularity effects have thus far not been manipulated orthogonally. The present research uses a joint evaluation approach to examine the relative contribution of identifiability and singularity in moral decision-making reflecting conflicting values between deontology and consequentialism. As in trolley dilemmas subjects could either choose to stay with the default option, i.e., giving a potentially life-saving vaccine to a single child, or to actively choose to deny the single child the vaccine in favor of five other children. Identifiability of the single child and the group of children was varied between-subjects in a 2x2 factorial design. In total 1,232 subjects from Sweden and the United States participated in three separate experiments. Across all treatments, in all three experiments, 32.6% of the subjects chose to stay with the deontological default option instead of actively choosing to maximize benefits. Results show that identifiability does not always have a positive effect on decisions in allocation dilemmas. For single targets, identifiability had a negative or no effect in two out of three experiments, while for the group of targets identifiability had a more stable positive effect on subjects’ willingness to allocate vaccines. When the effect of identifiability was negative, process data showed that this effect was mediated by emotional reactance. Hence, the results show that the influence of identifiability is more complex than it has been previously portrayed in the literature on charitable giving. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Wiss, J., Andersson, D., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015). The influence of identifiability and singularity in moral decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 492–502. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/22014 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Decision Research | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Judgement and Decision Making;Vol. 10, No. 5 | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en |
| dc.subject | Identifiable victims | en |
| dc.subject | Singularity effect | en |
| dc.subject | Resource allocation | en |
| dc.subject | Trolley dilemma | en |
| dc.subject | Moral judgment | en |
| dc.subject | Decision making | en |
| dc.subject | Charitable giving | en |
| dc.title | The influence of identifiability and singularity in moral decision making | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |