Disconnecting the Dots: Anonymity in the Digital Age
| dc.contributor.author | Hanover, Sydney | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-29T23:09:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-29T23:09:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-05-16 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Governmental and corporate spying are no longer a surprising facet of everyday life in the digital age. In this paper, I expand upon the implications at stake in debates on autonomy, privacy, and anonymity, and I arrive at a definition of anonymity involving the flow between traits and the inability to connect them based on deliberate non- publication on a structurally social level. I argue that cultivating the space to remain anonymous is useful for distanced association with oneself in the purely private internal sphere, furthering a more fully examined inner association not based on a future already predicted or prematurely acted upon. The privilege of anonymity is a precondition for genuine self-relation. Later, I argue doubly against the “nothing to hide” argument, i.e., if one has nothing to hide, one has nothing to fear. Firstly, the actionability and fabrication of data make it such that it is always at risk of being interpreted as unsafe. Secondly, this argument is predicated on hiddenness as negative, which I answer with an analysis of the functionality of anonymity concerning personal growth. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5399/uo/exanimo.1.1.2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/26371 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY | en_US |
| dc.subject | privacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | anonymity | en_US |
| dc.subject | technology | en_US |
| dc.title | Disconnecting the Dots: Anonymity in the Digital Age | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |