When Private Entities Use Video Surveillance in Public Space: Personal Benefits vs. Privacy Infringements

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLasher, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-13T23:32:54Z
dc.date.available2008-11-13T23:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-13T23:32:54Z
dc.descriptionThis paper was completed as part of the final research component in the University of Oregon Applied Information Management Master's Degree Program [see htpp://aim.uoregon.edu].en
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the most common video surveillance applications currently used by private entities in public spaces. Through literature review and content analysis (Leedy and Ormrod, 2005) the paper examines: monitoring, facial recognition, inclusion of video in larger databases, tracking, and security applications (Davis, 2005). Purported benefits of these technologies are aligned with potential privacy intrusions. A personal decision tool provides readers with a process to evaluate their own feelings about video surveillance and privacy.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/7823
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAIM Capstone 2006;Michael Lasher
dc.subjectSecurity applicationsen
dc.subjectPrivacy intrusionen
dc.subjectApplied Information Managementen
dc.subjectDataen
dc.subjectFacial recognitionen
dc.subjectVideo surveillanceen
dc.subjectAIM
dc.titleWhen Private Entities Use Video Surveillance in Public Space: Personal Benefits vs. Privacy Infringementsen
dc.typeOtheren

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2006-lasher.pdf
Size:
776.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
AIM Terminal Project
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Applied Information Management Master's Capstone Projects and Papers