Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMerskin, Debra
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-02T21:12:57Z
dc.date.available2011-11-02T21:12:57Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1064-6175
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/11739
dc.description.abstractWhat’s in a name? Plenty when it comes to the ability of words to establish identity. In 2005 in Oregon, for example, 142 land features carried the name ‘‘squaw’’—Squaw Gulch, Squaw Butte, Squaw Meadows, and Squaw Flat Reservoir (U.S. Geological Survey, 2008). This article examines the term squaw, its presentation in popular culture, and how this framing constructs Native womanhood in the public imagination. Two primary representations are revealed in the discourse defining squaw: as sexual punching bag and as drudge. The opinions and attitudes of reporters, citizens (Indian and non-Indian), government officials, agencies, and tribal representatives are included as reflected in journalistic accounts of the land form debate about the use and meaning of the label squaw. The psychological impact of this racial and sexual slur has a significant negative impact on quality of life, perceptions, and opportunities for Native American women (ethnostress) due to the consistent use and reification of the squaw stereotype through more than 400 years of U.S. history. This article is written as part of a larger body of work that argues for an expansion of Schroeder and Borgerson’s (2005, 2008) representational ethics of images to include words.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHoward Journal of Communicationsen_US
dc.subjectAdvertisingen_US
dc.subjectIndian women
dc.subjectAmerican Indian
dc.subjectDiscourse
dc.subjectEthnostress
dc.subjectNative Americans
dc.subjectStereotypes (Social psychology)
dc.subjectWomen
dc.titleThe S-Word: Discourse, Stereotypes, and the American Indian Womanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record