dc.contributor.author |
Sternlight, Jean R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-04-06T01:14:39Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-04-06T01:14:39Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
90 Or. L. Rev.703 (2012) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12132 |
|
dc.description |
26 pages |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
It is highly ironic but no less distressing that a case with a name
meaning “conception” should come to signify death for the legal
claims of many potential plaintiffs. The U.S. Supreme Court’s fiveto-
four decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is proving to
be a tsunami that is wiping out existing and potential consumer and
employment class actions. This Article will explore the decision;
how the decision is being interpreted by lower courts; the decision’s
impact on parties to such litigation; and how, if not legislatively
limited, this case will substantially harm consumers, employees, and
perhaps others. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en_US |
dc.rights |
rights_reserved |
en_US |
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 703-728 : Tsunami: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Impedes Access to Justice |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
Tsunami: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Impedes Access to Justice |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |