dc.contributor.author |
Tatoian, Erica R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-05-10T21:54:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-05-10T21:54:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-05-09 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
31 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 147 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1049-0280 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19863 |
|
dc.description |
20 pages |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The law treats our companion animals, for most purposes, the same as other forms of chattel: a pair of shoes, a chair, a cell phone. But how can this be so? How can the law not discern between sentient beings and inanimate objects? |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en_US |
dc.rights |
All Rights Reserved. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Pets |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Animal rights |
en_US |
dc.title |
Animals in the Law: Occupying a Space Between Legal Personhood and Personal Property |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |