School of Law
Permanent URI for this community
The School of Law was founded in 1884, and was the first Pacific Northwest law school to be accredited by the American Bar Association. Today, the Knight Law Center is home to Oregon's comprehensive public law school. The School of Law offers many endowed centers and special programs, including Dispute Resolution, Environmental and Natural Resources Law, Law and Entrepreneurship, Ocean and Coastal Law, the Portland Program, Public Interest-Public Service, Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics, the Legal Research and Writing Program, and various student groups including three law reviews.
For more information about the School and its programs, visit the web site .
Browse
Browsing School of Law by Most Recent
Now showing 1 - 20 of 65
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Restitution of Tribal Voices(2023) Harbeson, EricTitle II of the Music Modernization Act of 2018 is considered in the context of pre-1972 sound recordings fixed on lands owned by native American tribes. The law changed the way in which ownership of pre-1972 recordings is determined. Under the new law, ownership of tribal pre-1972 recordings would be determined by the law—likely the common law—of the tribe, with potentially significant consequences for tribes wishing to control access to works recorded and published without their consent.Item Open Access The Orrin Hatch – Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act: A guide for sound recordings collectors(Library of Congress, 2021) Harbeson, EricThe Music Modernization Act is reviewed in detail, with a particular eye toward the implications for members of the community supported by the National Recording Preservation Board, including librarians, archivists, and private collectors. The guide attempts an exhaustive treatment using plain but legally precise language.Item Open Access Teen Health Care Decisions : How Maturity and Social Policy Affect Four Hard Cases(Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017-05-10) Harris, Leslie JoanLegal standards that allow teens to make health care decisions, or any important decisions, must account for the contingency and variability of minors’ capacity. Traditional law denied minors’ legal authority to make any decisions, giving all power to parents. This rule goes too far; the Supreme Court has held that minors have constitutionally protected autonomy-based rights, and modern views about adolescence are inconsistent with the rule. The question is how and where to draw lines. Legal standards are based on minors’ evolving maturity, policy favoring decisions that follow medical advice, and policy supporting parental authority. This paper uses four hard cases to show how these considerations factor into legal rules.Item Open Access Dave Frohnmayer: Legacy, Schmegacy(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Rae, MarlaItem Open Access A Legacy of Expression: Dave Frohnmayer and the Humanities in Oregon(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Clark, Michael J.Item Open Access Dave Frohnmayer – A Tribute(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Schuman, DavidItem Open Access Public Funding and the Road to Damascus: The Legacy of Employment Division v. Smith(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Epps, GarrettItem Open Access Dave Frohnmayer and the Apocalypse That Evaporated(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Goldman, MarionItem Open Access Dave: Student, Friend, and Hero(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Choper, Jesse H.Item Open Access The Frohnmayer Method: Advocacy, Legal Policy, and the United States Supreme Court(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Gary, William F.; Gary, Alison K.Item Open Access A Tribute to Dave Frohnmayer(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Rosenblum, EllenItem Open Access Legislator, Lawyer, Scholar, and Teacher: Dave Frohnmayer’s Contributions to Oregon Administrative Law(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Landau, Jack L.Item Open Access Reflections of Law, Family, and Brotherhood(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Frohnmayer, JohnItem Open Access Dave Frohnmayer and the Oregon Legislature(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Myers, HardyItem Open Access Nominated by Both Parties(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Hubin, David R.Item Open Access Supremely Worthwhile: Two Decades of Dave Frohnmayer Teaching Leadership(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) West, BarbaraItem Open Access Dave Frohnmayer: The Legacy of a Life of Leadership and Law(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Moffitt, MichaelItem Open Access Foreword on David Frohnmayer(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Schill, Michael H.Item Open Access Tribute to President Emeritus Dave Frohnmayer(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-07-06) Editorial BoardItem Open Access When Our Reach Exceeds Our Grasp: Remedial Realism in Antidiscrimination Law(University of Oregon School of Law, 2016-05-09) Girvan, Erik J.This Article reviews major developments in anti-discrimination doctrine related to discretionary decisions in two different domains—the death penalty and employment decisions—and highlights the role that judicial concerns about remedies plays in the opinions supporting those developments. In order to more effectively impact the doctrinal development in that area, this Article discusses concrete ways that the remedies understanding of the law-science gap can help guide social scientists, legal scholars, and advocates for expanded anti-discrimination rights.