Ex Animo: Vol. 1, Issue 1

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1794/26369

Browse

Browsing Ex Animo: Vol. 1, Issue 1 by Subject "abstraction"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A Critical Examination of Abstraction in John Dewey’s Reflective Thought
    (University of Oregon, 2021-05-16) O'Brien, Bill
    The purpose of this paper is to critically examine abstraction in the context of John Dewey’s notion of reflective thought. Abstraction is to be understood as a pragmatic tool that underpins reflective thought. In other words, reflective thought—that is, the capacity to think of practical solutions to problems we confront in our lives,— needs to use the tool of pragmatic abstraction. In the context of reflective thought, I explore and explain how pragmatic abstraction is used. Here, I take issue with how pragmatic abstraction is used as merely a means to bring about ‘successful’ consequences to a problem. This use of pragmatic abstraction fails to consider the critical question of whose success is being brought about. Due to this, ‘successful’ consequences to a problem can result for some, while negative consequences to the same problem can result for others. The ‘reasonable woman standard’ that developed in the law illustrates a concrete example of this problematic split and a legal effort to resolve it. Ultimately, by reconsidering how reflective thought uses the tool of pragmatic abstraction, “successful” consequences to problems are brought about in a more inclusive manner.

We use and require that authors grant to the public a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly cited. Click here to view a copy of this license or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. The author retains full copyright ownership for works published in Ex Animo.

For more information about the legal code of the Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons license, click here.

Ex Animo uses Scholars’ Bank as our archiving system. Authors who submit their research to Scholars’ Bank retain their copyright unless they explicitly give it away to a third party. The University of Oregon Libraries does not seek nor claim copyright on work submitted to Scholars’ Bank. The Libraries ask authors to agree to a non-exclusive distribution license, which means that authors may make copies of their work available on other sites or formally publish their work without obtaining permission from the Libraries.