Lininger, Tom

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1794/18789

Tom Lininger is the Orlando J. and Marian H. Hollis Professor of Law at the UO School of Law. His research presently focuses on the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, particularly the application of the clause to prosecutions of domestic violence and sexual assault.

For more information, visit the School of Law's faculty web site.

Browse

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Open Access
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 89, No. 4, p. 1407-1444 : Should Oregon Adopt the New Federal Rules of Evidence?
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Lininger, Tom
This essay explores whether Oregon should adopt the restyled Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), and if so, to what extent. Part I analyzes the most important differences between the present versions of the Oregon Evidence Code (OEC) and the FRE. (This Part may be useful to students who need to memorize the unique features of the OEC in order to prepare for the Oregon Bar Exam.) Part II considers the primary reasons why the Oregon rules have departed from the federal model over the last few decades. Part III explores the advantages of adopting the restyled federal rules. Part IV addresses the disadvantages of importing the restyled rules in the OEC. Part V suggests one possible compromise that would preserve the distinctive character of the OEC while benefiting from the improvements to the FRE.
Open Access
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 85, No. 2, p.000-000 : Foreward: Symposium: Disentangling Church and State: Have the Courts Done Enough?
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2006) Lininger, Tom
Open Access
Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 383-391 : Grid and Beat It: How Regional Energy Grids Thwart Sustainability in the Siting of Gas-fired Power Plants
(University of Oregon School of Law, 2005) Lininger, Tom

Browse

Recent Submissions