The numeric understanding measures: Developing and validating adaptive and nonadaptive numeracy scales
| dc.contributor.author | Silverstein, Michael C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bjälkebring, Pär | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shoots-Reinhard, Brittany | |
| dc.contributor.author | Peters, Ellen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-24T01:33:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-24T01:33:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-06-28 | |
| dc.description | 19 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Numeracy—the ability to understand and use numeric information—is linked to good decision-making. Several problems exist with current numeracy measures, however. Depending on the participant sample, some existing measures are too easy or too hard; also, established measures often contain items well-known to participants. The current article aimed to develop new numeric understanding measures (NUMs) including a 1-item (1-NUM), 4-item (4-NUM), and 4-item adaptive measure (A-NUM). In a calibration study, 2 participant samples (n = 226 and 264 from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk [MTurk]) each responded to half of 84 novel numeracy items.We calibrated items using 2-parameter logistic item response theory (IRT) models. Based on item parameters, we developed the 3 new numeracy measures. In a subsequent validation study, 600 MTurk participants completed the new numeracy measures, the adaptive Berlin Numeracy Test, and the Weller Rasch-Based Numeracy Test, in randomized order. To establish predictive and convergent validities, participants also completed judgment and decision tasks, Raven’s progressive matrices, a vocabulary test, and demographics. Confirmatory factor analyses suggested that the 1-NUM, 4-NUM, and A-NUM load onto the same factor as existing measures. The NUM scales also showed similar association patterns to subjective numeracy and cognitive ability measures as established measures. Finally, they effectively predicted classic numeracy effects. In fact, based on power analyses, the A-NUM and 4-NUM appeared to confer more power to detect effects than existing measures. Thus, using IRT, we developed 3 brief numeracy measures, using novel items and without sacrificing construct scope. The measures can be downloaded as Qualtrics files (https://osf.io/pcegz/). | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Silverstein, M., Bjälkebring, P., Shoots-Reinhard, B., & Peters, E. (2023). The numeric understanding measures: Developing and validating adaptive and nonadaptive numeracy scales. Judgment and Decision Making, 18, E19. doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.17 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.17 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/29013 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
| dc.subject | Numeracy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Numeric literacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Numeric reasoning | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adaptive test | en_US |
| dc.subject | Validation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision-making | en_US |
| dc.title | The numeric understanding measures: Developing and validating adaptive and nonadaptive numeracy scales | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |