Keeping the Box Black: AI Regulation and Corporate Ambiguity
| dc.contributor.advisor | Galvan, Dennis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Garcia, Max | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-30T19:16:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-30T19:16:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description | 56 pages | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines early regulatory steps taken concerning AI and corporations' response to its development. It will analyze the importance and roles of Senate hearings in the United States and the ability of the United States legislature to tackle increasingly rapid technological shifts to contextualize the primary case study. This case study concerns the first Senate hearing in the United States about AI, where both legacy and novel companies developing AI systems were present. In properly examining this landmark case, suggestions are made as to possible paths governments could take to avoid worst-case scenarios with the deployment of AI, while simultaneously not stifling the development of potentially world-altering systems. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0009-0007-2215-2477 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/29927 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon | |
| dc.rights | CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | |
| dc.subject | AI Regulation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Soft Law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Senate Hearings in the United States | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dodging Regulation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Global Approaches to Regulation | en_US |
| dc.title | Keeping the Box Black: AI Regulation and Corporate Ambiguity | |
| dc.type | Thesis/Dissertation |