What’s the Harm in Asking? Participant Reaction to Trauma History Questions Compared with Other Personal Questions
Loading...
Date
2004-11
Authors
Binder, Angela
Cromer, Lisa D.
Freyd, Jennifer J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Previous empirical research has linked the disclosure of traumatic experiences through writing with increased positive cognitive processing and physiological well-being (Park & Blumberg, 2002). The benefits of disclosure seem to outweigh the costs in many cases. Other research suggests that not asking about trauma experiences may actually have negative consequences by perpetuating societal stigmas that serve to avoid discussion about trauma (Becker-Blease & Freyd, 2002). In the present study (N=275) the researchers compared participant's emotional reactions to trauma questions with their reactions to other possibly invasive questions through a self-report survey. Participants were also asked about how important they felt each question was to future research. This research addresses the cost/benefit of asking about trauma compared to other possibly invasive questions commonly examined in research by simply asking participants about their experiences.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Binder, A., Cromer, L.D., & Freyd, J.J. (2004) What's the harm in asking? Participant reaction to trauma history questions compared with other personal questions. Poster presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, New Orleans, LA, November 14-18, 2004.