dc.contributor.author |
Symeonides, Symeon C. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-11-23T19:45:17Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-11-23T19:45:17Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/10841 |
|
dc.description |
90 p. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
On January 1, 2010, Oregon’s new choice-of-law codification for
tort conflicts went into effect.1 This pioneering statute is one
more example of Oregon’s well-established propensity and capacity
to innovate and to lead. The new statute is the first attempt to codify
this interesting but difficult subject in a common-law state in the
United States. This Article provides a section-by-section exegesis
of the new statute in an effort to assist courts and counsel in
interpreting and applying it. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon Law School |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Torts |
|
dc.subject |
Conflict of laws |
|
dc.subject |
Choice of law |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 88 No. 4, p. 963-1052 : Oregon’s New Choice-of-Law Codification for Tort Conflicts: An Exegesis |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
Oregon’s New Choice-of-Law Codification for Tort Conflicts: An Exegesis |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |