dc.contributor.author |
Ceder, Timothy C. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-12-14T17:42:55Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-12-14T17:42:55Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
89 Or. L. Rev. 351 (2010) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/10904 |
|
dc.description |
34 p. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This Note analyzes the Comprehensive Drug Testing(CDT) guidelines in five parts. Part I briefly
reviews the facts of the case to provide context to the guidelines and
their intended application. Part II explains the basic governing law
and concedes the point that the government failed to comply with that
law. Part III explores how the decision impacts magistrate judges and
affects their ability to issue warrants. Part IV discusses the
government’s ability to execute warrants after CDT and the
guidelines’ impact on cases thus far. Part V discusses whether CDT
should be vacated or limited to methods that are implementable and
founded on established law. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon Law School |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Drug testing -- Law and legislation |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 351-384 : The Guidelines of Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.: A Measured Approach? |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
The Guidelines of Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.: A Measured Approach? |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |