Abstract:
In this paper I examine how popular news stories represent depression, and how
they may either successfully create accurate, balanced narratives, or fail to correct
existing misconceptions. Mainstream reporting often discusses depression in the context
of a controversy, and exposes unfamiliar audiences only to extreme depictions. Such
reporting may fail to correct stigma and misconceptions. I summarize the general
medical understanding of depression, common misunderstandings, and journalistic
standards for reporting on mental illness. From there, I compare mainstream news
stories with a feature article from Kaiser Health News to determine the potential
benefits and weaknesses from the differing styles of reporting. I conclude that stories
that allow for greater emphasis on character can likely provide greater insight for new
audiences, and more beneficial information for people experiencing depression. I end
with a reflection of my work on the accompanying audio piece I created.
Description:
55 pages. A thesis presented to the Department of Journalism and the Clark Honors College of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Bachelor of Arts, Spring 2016.